Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination
by
Siontis, George C.M.
, Tzoulaki, Ioanna
, Ioannidis, John P.A.
, Castaldi, Peter J.
in
Area Under Curve
/ Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
/ Biomarkers
/ Clinical medicine
/ Derivation study
/ Discrimination
/ Disease
/ Epidemiology
/ External validation
/ Forecasting
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Models, Statistical
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Probability
/ Prognosis
/ Prognostic models
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Risk
/ Risk prediction model
/ Validation studies
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination
by
Siontis, George C.M.
, Tzoulaki, Ioanna
, Ioannidis, John P.A.
, Castaldi, Peter J.
in
Area Under Curve
/ Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
/ Biomarkers
/ Clinical medicine
/ Derivation study
/ Discrimination
/ Disease
/ Epidemiology
/ External validation
/ Forecasting
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Models, Statistical
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Probability
/ Prognosis
/ Prognostic models
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Risk
/ Risk prediction model
/ Validation studies
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination
by
Siontis, George C.M.
, Tzoulaki, Ioanna
, Ioannidis, John P.A.
, Castaldi, Peter J.
in
Area Under Curve
/ Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
/ Biomarkers
/ Clinical medicine
/ Derivation study
/ Discrimination
/ Disease
/ Epidemiology
/ External validation
/ Forecasting
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Models, Statistical
/ Mortality
/ Prediction models
/ Probability
/ Prognosis
/ Prognostic models
/ Reproducibility of Results
/ Risk
/ Risk prediction model
/ Validation studies
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination
Journal Article
External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
To evaluate how often newly developed risk prediction models undergo external validation and how well they perform in such validations.
We reviewed derivation studies of newly proposed risk models and their subsequent external validations. Study characteristics, outcome(s), and models' discriminatory performance [area under the curve, (AUC)] in derivation and validation studies were extracted. We estimated the probability of having a validation, change in discriminatory performance with more stringent external validation by overlapping or different authors compared to the derivation estimates.
We evaluated 127 new prediction models. Of those, for 32 models (25%), at least an external validation study was identified; in 22 models (17%), the validation had been done by entirely different authors. The probability of having an external validation by different authors within 5 years was 16%. AUC estimates significantly decreased during external validation vs. the derivation study [median AUC change: −0.05 (P < 0.001) overall; −0.04 (P = 0.009) for validation by overlapping authors; −0.05 (P < 0.001) for validation by different authors]. On external validation, AUC decreased by at least 0.03 in 19 models and never increased by at least 0.03 (P < 0.001).
External independent validation of predictive models in different studies is uncommon. Predictive performance may worsen substantially on external validation.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.