Journal Article

Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process

Lambert, Veronica, O'Connor, Joan, Adshead, Maura, Ní Shé, Éidín, Dunn, Eleanor, Loughnane, Cliona, Kroll, Thilo, Morton, Sarah, Lacey, Vanessa, Ní Cheallaigh, Cliona, McCann, Amanda

2019

Overview

Objective Public and patient involvement is increasingly embedded as a core activity in research funding calls and best practice guidelines. However, there is recognition of the challenges that prevail to achieve genuine and equitable forms of engagement. Our objective was to identify the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research. Methods A rapid realist review of the literature that included: (a) a systematic search of CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Open Grey (2007‐2017); (b) documents provided by expert panel members of relevant journals and grey literature. Six reference panels were undertaken with homeless, women's, transgender, disability and Traveller and Roma organizations to capture local insights. Data were extracted into a theory‐based grid linking context to behaviour change policy categories. Main results From the review, 20 documents were identified and combined with the reference panel summaries. The expert panel reached consensus about 33 programme theories. These relate to environmental and social planning (7); service provision (6); guidelines (4); fiscal measures (6); communication and marketing (4); and regulation and legislation (6). Conclusions While there is growing evidence of the merits of undertaking PPI, this rarely extends to the meaningful involvement of seldom heard groups. The 33 programme theories agreed by the expert panel point to a variety of mechanisms and resources that need to be considered. Many of the programme theories identified point to the need for a radical shift in current practice to enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups.

• Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
• Subject: Behavior modification / behaviour change wheel / Best practice / Collaboration / Community Participation / Cooperative Behavior / co‐design / Funding / Groups / Guidelines / Health / health and social care research / Health services / Health Services Research / Homeless people / Homelessness / Humans / Legislation / LGBTQ people / Literature reviews / Marketing / Medical research / Participation / Patient Participation / public and patient involvement / rapid realist review / Research funding / Research Personnel / Researchers / Resources / Review / Romanies / seldom heard / Social groups / Social planning / Social services / Systematic review / Theory / Transgender persons