Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique
Do you wish to request the book?
BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique
2012
Overview
Brain extraction is an important step in the analysis of brain images. The variability in brain morphology and the difference in intensity characteristics due to imaging sequences make the development of a general purpose brain extraction algorithm challenging. To address this issue, we propose a new robust method (BEaST) dedicated to produce consistent and accurate brain extraction. This method is based on nonlocal segmentation embedded in a multi-resolution framework. A library of 80 priors is semi-automatically constructed from the NIH-sponsored MRI study of normal brain development, the International Consortium for Brain Mapping, and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative databases.
In testing, a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.9834±0.0053 was obtained when performing leave-one-out cross validation selecting only 20 priors from the library. Validation using the online Segmentation Validation Engine resulted in a top ranking position with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.9781±0.0047. Robustness of BEaST is demonstrated on all baseline ADNI data, resulting in a very low failure rate. The segmentation accuracy of the method is better than two widely used publicly available methods and recent state-of-the-art hybrid approaches. BEaST provides results comparable to a recent label fusion approach, while being 40 times faster and requiring a much smaller library of priors.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited,Elsevier
Subject
/ Adult
/ BET
/ Brain
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data
/ Male
/ Methods
/ MRI
/ Software
/ Studies
