MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC
Journal Article

Regression models for predicting physical and EQD2 plan parameters of two methods of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background/purpose To establish regression models of physical and equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD 2 ) plan parameters of two kinds of hybrid planning for stage III NSCLC. Methods Two kinds of hybrid plans named conventional fraction radiotherapy & stereotactic body radiotherapy (C&S) and conventional fraction radiotherapy & simultaneous integrated boost (C&SIB) were retrospectively made for 20 patients with stage III NSCLC. Prescription dose of C&S plans was 2 Gy × 30f for planning target volume of lymph node (PTV LN ) and 12.5 Gy × 4f for planning target volume of primary tumor (PTV PT ), while prescription dose of C&SIB plans was 2 Gy × 26f for PTV LN and sequential 2 Gy × 4f for PTV LN combined with 12.5 Gy × 4f for PTV PT . Regression models of physical and EQD 2 plan parameters were established based on anatomical geometry features for two kinds of hybrid plans. The features were mainly characterized by volume ratio, min distance and overlapping slices thickness of two structures. The possibilities of regression models of EQD 2 plan parameters were verified by spearman’s correlation coefficients between physical and EQD 2 plan parameters, and the influence on the consistence of fitting goodness between physical and EQD 2 models was investigated by the correlations between physical and EQD 2 plan parameters. Finally, physical and EQD 2 models predictions were compared with plan parameters for two new patients. Results Physical and EQD 2 plan parameters of PTV LN CI 60Gy have shown strong positive correlations with PTV LN volume and min distance (PT to LN) , and strong negative correlations with PTV PT volume for two kinds of hybrid plans. PTV (PT+LN) CI 60Gy is not only correlated with above three geometry features, but also negatively correlated with overlapping slices thickness (PT and LN) . When neck lymph node metastasis was excluded from PTV LN volume, physical and EQD 2 total lung V 20 showed a high linear correlation with corrected volume ratio (LN to total lung). Meanwhile, physical total lung mean dose (MLD) had a high linear correlation with corrected volume ratio (LN to total lung) , while EQD 2 total lung MLD was not only affected by corrected volume ratio (LN to total lung) but also volume ratio (PT to total lung). Heart D 5 , D 30 and mean dose (MHD) would be more susceptible to overlapping structure (heart and LN) . Min distance (PT to ESO) may be an important feature for predicting EQD 2 esophageal max dose for hybrid plans. It’s feasible for regression models of EQD 2 plan parameters, and the consistence of the fitting goodness of physical and EQD 2 models had a positive correlation with spearman’s correlation coefficients between physical and EQD 2 plan parameters. For total lung V 20 , ipsilateral lung V 20 , and ipsilateral lung MLD, the models could predict that C&SIB plans were higher than C&S plans for two new patients. Conclusion The regression models of physical and EQD 2 plan parameters were established with at least moderate fitting goodness in this work, and the models have a potential to predict physical and EQD 2 plan parameters for two kinds of hybrid planning.