Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Propensity Score Matching in Randomized Clinical Trials
by
Kalbfleisch, John D.
, Xu, Zhenzhen
in
BIOMETRIC METHODOLOGY
/ Biometrics
/ biometry
/ Clinical trials
/ Cluster analysis
/ Clustered randomized trial
/ Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
/ education programs
/ Estimators
/ Experimental design
/ Experimentation
/ Health care
/ health services
/ Humans
/ methods
/ Modeling
/ Observational studies
/ Optimal full matching
/ patients
/ Propensity Score
/ Propensity score matching
/ Random Allocation
/ Randomization study
/ randomized clinical trials
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Design
/ Sample size
/ stroke
/ Stroke volume
/ Strokes
2010
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Propensity Score Matching in Randomized Clinical Trials
by
Kalbfleisch, John D.
, Xu, Zhenzhen
in
BIOMETRIC METHODOLOGY
/ Biometrics
/ biometry
/ Clinical trials
/ Cluster analysis
/ Clustered randomized trial
/ Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
/ education programs
/ Estimators
/ Experimental design
/ Experimentation
/ Health care
/ health services
/ Humans
/ methods
/ Modeling
/ Observational studies
/ Optimal full matching
/ patients
/ Propensity Score
/ Propensity score matching
/ Random Allocation
/ Randomization study
/ randomized clinical trials
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Design
/ Sample size
/ stroke
/ Stroke volume
/ Strokes
2010
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Propensity Score Matching in Randomized Clinical Trials
by
Kalbfleisch, John D.
, Xu, Zhenzhen
in
BIOMETRIC METHODOLOGY
/ Biometrics
/ biometry
/ Clinical trials
/ Cluster analysis
/ Clustered randomized trial
/ Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
/ education programs
/ Estimators
/ Experimental design
/ Experimentation
/ Health care
/ health services
/ Humans
/ methods
/ Modeling
/ Observational studies
/ Optimal full matching
/ patients
/ Propensity Score
/ Propensity score matching
/ Random Allocation
/ Randomization study
/ randomized clinical trials
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
/ Research Design
/ Sample size
/ stroke
/ Stroke volume
/ Strokes
2010
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Propensity Score Matching in Randomized Clinical Trials
2010
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Cluster randomization trials with relatively few clusters have been widely used in recent years for evaluation of health-care strategies. On average, randomized treatment assignment achieves balance in both known and unknown confounding factors between treatment groups, however, in practice investigators can only introduce a small amount of stratification and cannot balance on all the important variables simultaneously. The limitation arises especially when there are many confounding variables in small studies. Such is the case in the INSTINCT trial designed to investigate the effectiveness of an education program in enhancing the tPA use in stroke patients. In this article, we introduce a new randomization design, the balance match weighted (BMW) design, which applies the optimal matching with constraints technique to a prospective randomized design and aims to minimize the mean squared error (MSE) of the treatment effect estimator. A simulation study shows that, under various confounding scenarios, the BMW design can yield substantial reductions in the MSE for the treatment effect estimator compared to a completely randomized or matched-pair design. The BMW design is also compared with a model-based approach adjusting for the estimated propensity score and Robins-Mark-Newey E-estimation procedure in terms of efficiency and robustness of the treatment effect estimator. These investigations suggest that the BMW design is more robust and usually, although not always, more efficient than either of the approaches. The design is also seen to be robust against heterogeneous error. We illustrate these methods in proposing a design for the INSTINCT trial.
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Inc,Wiley-Blackwell,Blackwell Publishing Ltd
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.