Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factor Structure and Measurement and Structural Invariance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the Perinatal Period among Japanese Women: What Is the Best Model?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factor Structure and Measurement and Structural Invariance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the Perinatal Period among Japanese Women: What Is the Best Model?
Do you wish to request the book?
Factor Structure and Measurement and Structural Invariance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the Perinatal Period among Japanese Women: What Is the Best Model?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Factor Structure and Measurement and Structural Invariance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the Perinatal Period among Japanese Women: What Is the Best Model?
2023
Overview
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely used screening tool for perinatal depression. Its factor structure is still a debatable topic. Our study aimed to examine the factor structure and measurement invariances of the Japanese version of the EPDS from late pregnancy to early postpartum. A total of 633 women were followed with the EPDS at three times over the perinatal period: late pregnancy (n = 633), 5 days after childbirth (n = 445), and 1 month after childbirth (n = 392). We randomly divided the participants into two groups: one for exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and another for confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). The result of the EFAs indicated different factor models at each time point. Hence, CFAs were performed using the second sample set to compare different models including the ones previously reported. A 3-factor model consisting of depression (items 7, 9), anxiety (items 4, 5), and anhedonia (items 1, 2) (Kubota et al., 2018) was consistently stable during the whole perinatal period. Kubota’s 3-factor model showed invariance across the perinatal period.
Publisher
MDPI AG,MDPI
