Journal Article

Pan-Canadian assessment of pandemic immunization data collection: study methodology

Sikora, Christopher A, Heidebrecht, Christine, Quan, Sherman, Buckeridge, David L, Kwong, Jeffrey C, Deeks, Shelley, Finkelstein, Michael, Foisy, Julie, Bettinger, Julie A, Pereira, Jennifer A, Quach, Susan, McCarthy, Anne

2010

Overview

Background The collection of individual-level pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza immunization data was considered important to facilitate optimal vaccine delivery and accurate assessment of vaccine coverage. These data are also critical for research aimed at evaluating the new vaccine's safety and effectiveness. Systems used to collect immunization data include manual approaches in which data are collected and retained on paper, electronic systems in which data are captured on computer at the point of vaccination and hybrid systems which are comprised of both computerized and manual data collection components. This study's objective was to compare the efficiencies and perceptions of data collection methods employed during Canada's pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign. Methods/Design A pan-Canadian observational study was conducted in a convenience sample of public health clinics and healthcare institutions during the H1N1 vaccination campaign in the fall of 2009. The study design consisted of three stages: Stage 1 involved passive observation of the site's layout, processes and client flow; Stage 2 entailed timing site staff on 20 clients through five core immunization tasks: i) client registration, ii) medical history collection, iii) medical history review, iv) vaccine administration record keeping and v) preparation of proof of vaccine administration for the client; in Stage 3, site staff completed a questionnaire regarding perceived usability of the site's data collection approach. Before the national study began, a pilot study was conducted in three seasonal influenza vaccination sites in Ontario, to both test that the proposed methodology was logistically feasible and to determine inter-rater reliability in the measurements of the research staff. Comparative analyses will be conducted across the range of data collection methods with respect to time required to collect immunization data, number and type of individual-level data elements collected, and clinic staff perceptions of the usability of the method employed at their site, using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Discussion Various data collection methods were employed at immunization sites across Canada during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign. Our comparison of methods can facilitate planning an efficient, coordinated approach for collecting immunization data in future influenza seasons.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: Analysis of Variance / Attitude of Health Personnel / Canada / Data Collection - methods / Data Collection - standards / Data entry / Health aspects / Health risk assessment / Health Sciences / Humans / Immunization / Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype / Influenza, Human - prevention & control / Mass Vaccination - statistics & numerical data / Medical History Taking / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Pandemics / Prevention / Research Design / Rural Population / Sample Size / Statistical Theory and Methods / Statistics for Life Sciences / Study Protocol / Surveys and Questionnaires / Swine influenza / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Time and Motion Studies / Urban Population