Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
by
Landais, Paul
, Le Manach, Yannick
, Devereaux, P. J.
, Spence, Jessica
, Nguyen, Tri-Long
, Collins, Gary S.
, Daurès, Jean-Pierre
in
Algorithms
/ Bias
/ Causal inference
/ Computer Simulation
/ Confounding
/ Covariate balance
/ Data analysis
/ Economic models
/ Health Sciences
/ Human health and pathology
/ Humans
/ Life Sciences
/ Logistic Models
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Models, Statistical
/ Monte Carlo Method
/ Propensity Score
/ Random variables
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methods
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Surgery
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
by
Landais, Paul
, Le Manach, Yannick
, Devereaux, P. J.
, Spence, Jessica
, Nguyen, Tri-Long
, Collins, Gary S.
, Daurès, Jean-Pierre
in
Algorithms
/ Bias
/ Causal inference
/ Computer Simulation
/ Confounding
/ Covariate balance
/ Data analysis
/ Economic models
/ Health Sciences
/ Human health and pathology
/ Humans
/ Life Sciences
/ Logistic Models
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Models, Statistical
/ Monte Carlo Method
/ Propensity Score
/ Random variables
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methods
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Surgery
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
by
Landais, Paul
, Le Manach, Yannick
, Devereaux, P. J.
, Spence, Jessica
, Nguyen, Tri-Long
, Collins, Gary S.
, Daurès, Jean-Pierre
in
Algorithms
/ Bias
/ Causal inference
/ Computer Simulation
/ Confounding
/ Covariate balance
/ Data analysis
/ Economic models
/ Health Sciences
/ Human health and pathology
/ Humans
/ Life Sciences
/ Logistic Models
/ Medical research
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Models, Statistical
/ Monte Carlo Method
/ Propensity Score
/ Random variables
/ Research Article
/ Statistical methods
/ Statistical Theory and Methods
/ statistics and modelling
/ Statistics for Life Sciences
/ Surgery
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
Journal Article
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Double-adjustment can be used to remove confounding if imbalance exists after propensity score (PS) matching. However, it is not always possible to include all covariates in adjustment. We aimed to find the optimal imbalance threshold for entering covariates into regression.
Methods
We conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations on virtual populations of 5,000 subjects. We performed PS 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching on each sample. We calculated standardized mean differences across groups to detect any remaining imbalance in the matched samples. We examined 25 thresholds (from 0.01 to 0.25, stepwise 0.01) for considering residual imbalance. The treatment effect was estimated using logistic regression that contained only those covariates considered to be unbalanced by these thresholds.
Results
We showed that regression adjustment could dramatically remove residual confounding bias when it included all of the covariates with a standardized difference greater than 0.10. The additional benefit was negligible when we also adjusted for covariates with less imbalance. We found that the mean squared error of the estimates was minimized under the same conditions.
Conclusion
If covariate balance is not achieved, we recommend reiterating PS modeling until standardized differences below 0.10 are achieved on most covariates. In case of remaining imbalance, a double adjustment might be worth considering.
Publisher
BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.