Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
by
Scrase, Christopher
, Hassan, Shama
, Kirkbride, Peter
, Birtle, Alison
, Hall, Emma
, Mayles, Helen
, Griffin, Clare
, Khoo, Vincent
, Syndikus, Isabel
, Panades, Miguel
, Logue, John
, Patterson, Helen
, Naismith, Olivia
, Cruickshank, Clare
, Tremlett, Jean
, Bloomfield, David
, South, Chris
, Mossop, Helen
, O'Sullivan, Joe M
, Graham, John
, Stockdale, Andrew
, Malik, Zafar
, Parker, Chris
, Staffurth, John
, Bidmead, Margaret
, Dearnaley, David
, Money-Kyrle, Julian
, Gao, Annie
, Pugh, Julia
in
Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Androgens
/ Antigens
/ Cancer therapies
/ Disease control
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
/ Humans
/ International Agencies
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Neoplasm Staging
/ Patients
/ Prostate cancer
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
/ Quality
/ Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
/ Risk Factors
/ Schedules
/ Survival Rate
/ Treatment Outcome
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
by
Scrase, Christopher
, Hassan, Shama
, Kirkbride, Peter
, Birtle, Alison
, Hall, Emma
, Mayles, Helen
, Griffin, Clare
, Khoo, Vincent
, Syndikus, Isabel
, Panades, Miguel
, Logue, John
, Patterson, Helen
, Naismith, Olivia
, Cruickshank, Clare
, Tremlett, Jean
, Bloomfield, David
, South, Chris
, Mossop, Helen
, O'Sullivan, Joe M
, Graham, John
, Stockdale, Andrew
, Malik, Zafar
, Parker, Chris
, Staffurth, John
, Bidmead, Margaret
, Dearnaley, David
, Money-Kyrle, Julian
, Gao, Annie
, Pugh, Julia
in
Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Androgens
/ Antigens
/ Cancer therapies
/ Disease control
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
/ Humans
/ International Agencies
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Neoplasm Staging
/ Patients
/ Prostate cancer
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
/ Quality
/ Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
/ Risk Factors
/ Schedules
/ Survival Rate
/ Treatment Outcome
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
by
Scrase, Christopher
, Hassan, Shama
, Kirkbride, Peter
, Birtle, Alison
, Hall, Emma
, Mayles, Helen
, Griffin, Clare
, Khoo, Vincent
, Syndikus, Isabel
, Panades, Miguel
, Logue, John
, Patterson, Helen
, Naismith, Olivia
, Cruickshank, Clare
, Tremlett, Jean
, Bloomfield, David
, South, Chris
, Mossop, Helen
, O'Sullivan, Joe M
, Graham, John
, Stockdale, Andrew
, Malik, Zafar
, Parker, Chris
, Staffurth, John
, Bidmead, Margaret
, Dearnaley, David
, Money-Kyrle, Julian
, Gao, Annie
, Pugh, Julia
in
Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ Androgens
/ Antigens
/ Cancer therapies
/ Disease control
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
/ Humans
/ International Agencies
/ Male
/ Middle Aged
/ Neoplasm Staging
/ Patients
/ Prostate cancer
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
/ Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
/ Quality
/ Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
/ Risk Factors
/ Schedules
/ Survival Rate
/ Treatment Outcome
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
Journal Article
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Prostate cancer might have high radiation-fraction sensitivity that would give a therapeutic advantage to hypofractionated treatment. We present a pre-planned analysis of the efficacy and side-effects of a randomised trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated radiotherapy after 5 years follow-up.
CHHiP is a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial that recruited men with localised prostate cancer (pT1b–T3aN0M0). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to conventional (74 Gy delivered in 37 fractions over 7·4 weeks) or one of two hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks or 57 Gy in 19 fractions over 3·8 weeks) all delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. Most patients were given radiotherapy with 3–6 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen suppression. Randomisation was by computer-generated random permuted blocks, stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group and radiotherapy treatment centre, and treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical or clinical failure; the critical hazard ratio (HR) for non-inferiority was 1·208. Analysis was by intention to treat. Long-term follow-up continues. The CHHiP trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN97182923.
Between Oct 18, 2002, and June 17, 2011, 3216 men were enrolled from 71 centres and randomly assigned (74 Gy group, 1065 patients; 60 Gy group, 1074 patients; 57 Gy group, 1077 patients). Median follow-up was 62·4 months (IQR 53·9–77·0). The proportion of patients who were biochemical or clinical failure free at 5 years was 88·3% (95% CI 86·0–90·2) in the 74 Gy group, 90·6% (88·5–92·3) in the 60 Gy group, and 85·9% (83·4–88·0) in the 57 Gy group. 60 Gy was non-inferior to 74 Gy (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·68–1·03], pNI=0·0018) but non-inferiority could not be claimed for 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy (HR 1·20 [0·99–1·46], pNI=0·48). Long-term side-effects were similar in the hypofractionated groups compared with the conventional group. There were no significant differences in either the proportion or cumulative incidence of side-effects 5 years after treatment using three clinician-reported as well as patient-reported outcome measures. The estimated cumulative 5 year incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse bowel and bladder adverse events was 13·7% (111 events) and 9·1% (66 events) in the 74 Gy group, 11·9% (105 events) and 11·7% (88 events) in the 60 Gy group, 11·3% (95 events) and 6·6% (57 events) in the 57 Gy group, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Hypofractionated radiotherapy using 60 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to conventional fractionation using 74 Gy in 37 fractions and is recommended as a new standard of care for external-beam radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.
Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited,Lancet Pub. Group
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.