Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Healthcare use and costs among individuals receiving mental health services for depression within primary care in Nepal
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Healthcare use and costs among individuals receiving mental health services for depression within primary care in Nepal
Do you wish to request the book?
Healthcare use and costs among individuals receiving mental health services for depression within primary care in Nepal
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Healthcare use and costs among individuals receiving mental health services for depression within primary care in Nepal
2022
Overview
Background
Integrating mental health services into primary care is a key strategy for reducing the mental healthcare treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries. We examined healthcare use and costs over time among individuals with depression and subclinical depressive symptoms in Chitwan, Nepal to understand the impact of integrated care on individual and health system resources.
Methods
Individuals diagnosed with depression at ten primary care facilities were randomized to receive a package of integrated care based on the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (treatment group; TG) or this package plus individual psychotherapy (TG + P); individuals with subclinical depressive symptoms received primary care as usual (UC). Primary outcomes were changes in use and health system costs of outpatient healthcare at 3- and 12-month follow up. Secondary outcomes examined use and costs by type. We used Poisson and log-linear models for use and costs, respectively, with an interaction term between time point and study group, and with TG as reference.
Results
The study included 192 primary care service users (TG = 60, TG +
P
= 60, UC = 72; 86% female, 24% formally employed, mean age 41.1). At baseline, outpatient visits were similar (− 11%,
p
= 0.51) among TG + P and lower (− 35%,
p
= 0.01) among UC compared to TG. Visits increased 2.30 times (
p
< 0.001) at 3 months among TG, with a 50% greater increase (
p
= 0.03) among TG + P, before returning to baseline levels among all groups at 12 months. Comparing TG + P to TG, costs were similar at baseline (− 1%,
p
= 0.97) and cost changes did not significantly differ at three (− 16%,
p
= 0.67) or 12 months (− 45%,
p
= 0.13). Costs among UC were 54% lower than TG at baseline (
p
= 0.005), with no significant differences in cost changes over follow up. Post hoc analysis indicated individuals not receiving psychotherapy used less frequent, more costly healthcare.
Conclusion
Delivering psychotherapy within integrated services for depression resulted in greater healthcare use without significantly greater costs to the health system or individual. Previous research in Chitwan demonstrated psychotherapy determined treatment effectiveness for people with depression. While additional research is needed into service implementation costs, our findings provide further evidence supporting the inclusion of psychotherapy within mental healthcare integration in Nepal and similar contexts.
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.