Journal Article

Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map

Frampton, Geoff K., Griffiths, Gareth, Pickett, Karen, Shepherd, Jonathan, Wyatt, Jeremy C.

2020

Overview

Background Recruiting and retaining participants in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging. Digital tools, such as social media, data mining, email or text-messaging, could improve recruitment or retention, but an overview of this research area is lacking. We aimed to systematically map the characteristics of digital recruitment and retention tools for RCTs, and the features of the comparative studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of these tools during the past 10 years. Methods We searched Medline, Embase, other databases, the Internet, and relevant web sites in July 2018 to identify comparative studies of digital tools for recruiting and/or retaining participants in health RCTs. Two reviewers independently screened references against protocol-specified eligibility criteria. Included studies were coded by one reviewer with 20% checked by a second reviewer, using pre-defined keywords to describe characteristics of the studies, populations and digital tools evaluated. Results We identified 9163 potentially relevant references, of which 104 articles reporting 105 comparative studies were included in the systematic map. The number of published studies on digital tools has doubled in the past decade, but most studies evaluated digital tools for recruitment rather than retention. The key health areas investigated were health promotion, cancers, circulatory system diseases and mental health. Few studies focussed on minority or under-served populations, and most studies were observational. The most frequently-studied digital tools were social media, Internet sites, email and tv/radio for recruitment; and email and text-messaging for retention. One quarter of the studies measured efficiency (cost per recruited or retained participant) but few studies have evaluated people’s attitudes towards the use of digital tools. Conclusions This systematic map highlights a number of evidence gaps and may help stakeholders to identify and prioritise further research needs. In particular, there is a need for rigorous research on the efficiency of the digital tools and their impact on RCT participants and investigators, perhaps as studies-within-a-trial (SWAT) research. There is also a need for research into how digital tools may improve participant retention in RCTs which is currently underrepresented relative to recruitment research. Registration Not registered; based on a pre-specified protocol, peer-reviewed by the project’s Advisory Board.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Alzheimer's disease / Automation / Biomedicine / Clinical trial efficiency / Clinical trial management / Clinical trials / Comparative analysis / Data mining / Efficiency, Organizational - economics / Efficiency, Organizational - standards / Email / Health Care Surveys / Health Sciences / Humans / Medical research / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Online recruitment / Participant identification and recruitment / Patient Selection / Patients / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - economics / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods / Recruitment strategies / Retention / Retention strategies / Review / School dropouts / Smartphones / Social Media / Social networks / Social research / Software / Stakeholder Participation / Statistical power / Statistics for Life Sciences / Systematic review / Text Messaging / United Kingdom