Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
Do you wish to request the book?
The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The value and effectiveness of geriatric assessments for older adults with cancer: an umbrella review
2024
Overview
Purpose
This umbrella review aimed to summarise and synthesize the evidence on the outcomes reported and used to assess the value and or efficacy of geriatric assessments (GAs) for older adults with cancer.
Methods
Six electronic databases, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases, were searched to identify systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses that described the value or outcomes of GAs for older adults with cancer.
Results
Twenty-six systematic reviews were included, of which six included a meta-analysis of the data. Thirteen associations and or outcomes were identified. Overall geriatric impairments predicted or were associated with majority of identified outcomes. However, the type of domains associated with outcomes differed within and across reviews. Only treatment toxicity was statistically significantly lower for patients allocated to the GA intervention group compared to standard care. Systematic reviews without meta-analyses demonstrated a positive impact of GA with management on treatment completion, communication and care planning and patient satisfaction with care.
Conclusion
There is evidence demonstrating the predictive value of GAs for older adults with cancer. GAs seems to be beneficial for older adults with cancer across some outcomes, with strong evidence demonstrating the impact of GA with management for treatment toxicity. However, there is mixed or limited evidence demonstrating the effect of GA in other treatment modalities, and on quality of life and economic outcomes.
