Journal Article

Using variant databases for variant prioritization and to detect erroneous genotype-phenotype associations

Deforce, Dieter, Broeckx, Bart J. G., Saunders, Jimmy H., Clement, Lieven, Peelman, Luc

2017

Overview

Background In the search for novel causal mutations, public and/or private variant databases are nearly always used to facilitate the search as they result in a massive reduction of putative variants in one step. Practically, variant filtering is often done by either using all variants from the variant database (called the absence-approach, i.e. it is assumed that disease-causing variants do not reside in variant databases) or by using the subset of variants with an allelic frequency > 1% (called the 1%-approach). We investigate the validity of these two approaches in terms of false negatives (the true disease-causing variant does not pass all filters) and false positives (a harmless mutation passes all filters and is erroneously retained in the list of putative disease-causing variants) and compare it with an novel approach which we named the quantile-based approach. This approach applies variable instead of static frequency thresholds and the calculation of these thresholds is based on prior knowledge of disease prevalence, inheritance models, database size and database characteristics. Results Based on real-life data, we demonstrate that the quantile-based approach outperforms the absence-approach in terms of false negatives. At the same time, this quantile-based approach deals more appropriately with the variable allele frequencies of disease-causing alleles in variant databases relative to the 1%-approach and as such allows a better control of the number of false positives. We also introduce an alternative application for variant database usage and the quantile-based approach. If disease-causing variants in variant databases deviate substantially from theoretical expectancies calculated with the quantile-based approach, their association between genotype and phenotype had to be reconsidered in 12 out of 13 cases. Conclusions We developed a novel method and demonstrated that this so-called quantile-based approach is a highly suitable method for variant filtering. In addition, the quantile-based approach can also be used for variant flagging. For user friendliness, lookup tables and easy-to-use R calculators are provided.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
• Subject: 1000 Genomes project variant database / Algorithms / Allele frequency / Bioinformatics / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Computational Biology/Bioinformatics / Computer Appl. in Life Sciences / dbSNP / HapMap / Knowledge-based analysis / Life Sciences / Methodology / Methodology Article / Microarrays / Variant database / Variant filtering