Journal Article

Pleural mesothelioma risk by industry and occupation: results from the Multicentre Italian Study on the Etiology of Mesothelioma (MISEM)

Cavone, Domenica, Vermeulen, Roel C. H., Merler, Enzo, Magnani, Corrado, Musti, Marina, Baldassarre, Antonio, Kromhout, Hans, Chellini, Elisabetta, Migliore, Enrica, Marinaccio, Alessandro, Consonni, Dario, Peters, Susan, Mensi, Carolina, Mirabelli, Dario

2022

Overview

Background The Italian mesothelioma registry (ReNaM) estimates mesothelioma incidence and addresses its etiology by assessing cases’ exposures but cannot provide relative risk estimates. Objectives i) To estimate pleural mesothelioma relative risk by industry and occupation and by ReNaM categories of asbestos exposure; and ii) to provide quantitative estimates of the exposure–response relationship. Methods A population-based mesothelioma case–control study was conducted in 2012–2014 in five Italian regions. Cases and age and gender frequency-matched controls were interviewed using a standard ReNaM questionnaire. Experts coded work histories according to international standard classifications of industries/occupations and assigned asbestos exposure according to ReNaM categories. Job codes were further linked to SYN-JEM, a quantitative job-exposure matrix. Cumulative exposure (CE, f/mL-years) was computed by summing individual exposures over lifetime work history. Unconditional logistic regression analyses adjusted by gender, centre and age were fitted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Among men we observed increased risks of mesothelioma in many industries and associated occupations, including: asbestos-cement (OR = 3.43), manufacture of railroad equipment (OR = 8.07), shipbuilding and repairing (OR = 2.34), iron and steel mills (OR = 2.15), and construction (OR = 1.94). ORs by ReNaM exposure categories were as follows: definite/probable occupational exposure (OR = 15.8, men; OR = 8.80, women), possible occupational (OR = 2.82, men; OR = 3.70, women), sharing home with an exposed worker (OR = 2.55, men; OR = 10.3, women), residential (OR = 2.14, men; OR = 3.24, women). Based on SYN-JEM, mesothelioma risk increased by almost 30% per f/mL-year (OR = 1.28, CI 1.16–1.42). Conclusions Out study involved five regions with historically different types and levels of industrial development, encompassing one third of the Italian population and half of Italian mesothelioma cases. As expected, we found increased pleural mesothelioma risk in the asbestos industry and in trades with large consumption of asbestos materials. Clear associations were found using both qualitative (ReNaM classifications) and quantitative estimates (using SYN-JEM) of past asbestos exposure, with clear evidence of an exposure–response relationship.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Asbestos / Case–control study / Categories / Classification / Confidence intervals / Demographic aspects / Dose-response relationship / Earth and Environmental Science / Employment / Employment interviews / Environment / Environmental Epidemiology / Environmental Health / Estimates / Etiology / Exposure / Exposure assessment / Gender / Industrial development / International standards / Iron and steel plants / Lung tumors / Men / Mesothelioma / Occupational diseases / Occupational exposure / Occupational health / Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine / Occupations / Pleural mesothelioma / Population / Public Health / Questionnaires / Regression analysis / Repair & maintenance / Risk / Risk factors / Shipbuilding / Statistical analysis / Steel industry