Journal Article

Videofluoroscopic swallow study training for radiologists-in-training: a survey of practice and training needs

Richards, John A., Lawrie, Melissa D., Ware, Robert S., Coman, Leah M., Cardell, Elizabeth A., Mahon, Amanda, Weir, Kelly A.

2022

Overview

Background There is a lack of formal, published videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) training targeting radiologists, yet radiology senior medical officers and resident medical officers (i.e., radiologists-in-training, known in Australia as “registrars”) are expected to be involved in VFSS interpretation of anatomical anomalies and reporting. This study investigated whether VFSS training is delivered to registrars during their specialist radiology training, whether it is a perceived need and, if so, to determine the desired content for inclusion in a targeted training package. Methods A cross-sectional, mixed methods study design was used. An internet-based survey was circulated via convenience and snowball sampling to radiologists (both senior medical officers and registrars) and speech-language pathologists across Australia in October-November 2017. Surveys also were distributed to practitioners based in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, as they practised within similar health systems, and it was anticipated they may have similar VFSS training practices. The radiology survey contained 36 questions and the speech-language pathology survey contained 44 questions. Participants were asked the following: (1) Report their current VFSS radiology registrar training environment; (2) Advise whether radiology registrars need VFSS training; (3) Recommend the content, format, training intensity, and evaluation methods for an effective radiology registrar training package. Demographic data were analysed descriptively, and open-ended responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results 21 radiology senior medical officers and registrars and 150 speech-language pathologists predominantly based at Australian tertiary hospital settings completed the survey. Most respondents (90.6%) identified that VFSS training is needed for radiology registrars. Only one speech-language pathologist respondent reported that they deliver VFSS training for radiology registrars. Specific content and teaching modalities for a VFSS training package, including diagnosing anatomical anomalies associated with dysphagia were recommended. Conclusion While most of the radiologists and speech-language pathologists surveyed did not deliver VFSS training to radiology registrars, they identified that targeted training is needed to improve radiology registrars’ effectiveness and engagement in VFSS clinics. The training package content, format and evaluation methods recommended by participants will inform the development of a VFSS training package targeting radiology registrars to be piloted at an Australian tertiary hospital.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Anatomy & physiology / Case Studies / Check Lists / Clinics / Collaboration / Competence / Dysphagia / Education / Educational Needs / Educational Opportunities / Employment / Evaluation / Fluoroscopy / Guidelines / Hospitals / Instrumental swallow assessment / Internet / Interrater Reliability / Medical Education / Medical education and training / Medical tests / Paraprofessional Personnel / Patient Education / Physiology / Polls & surveys / Radiology / Registrars / Registrars (School) / Rehabilitation / Resident medical officers / Speech Language Pathology / Stakeholders / Teaching Methods / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Training Methods / Validity / Videofluoroscopic swallow study