Journal Article

Can We Rely on Prophylactic Two-Level Vertebral Cement Augmentation in Long-Segment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Reduce the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications?

Nobuhiro Naka, Yoichi Tani, Naoto Ono, Masaaki Paku, Masayuki Ishihara, Muneharu Ando, Shinichirou Taniguchi, Takanori Saito, Koki Kawashima, Takashi Adachi

2024

Overview

Background and Objectives: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF), the most prevalent complications following long-segment thoracolumbar fusions for adult spinal deformity (ASD), remain lacking in defined preventive measures. We studied whether one of the previously reported strategies with successful results—a prophylactic augmentation of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent vertebra to the UIV (UIV + 1) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)—could also serve as a preventive measure of PJK/PJF in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Materials and Methods: The study included 29 ASD patients who underwent a combination of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) at L1-2 through L4-5, all-pedicle-screw instrumentation from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum, S2-alar-iliac fixation, and two-level balloon-assisted PMMA vertebroplasty at the UIV and UIV + 1. Results: With a minimum 3-year follow-up, non-PJK/PJF group accounted for fifteen patients (52%), PJK for eight patients (28%), and PJF requiring surgical revision for six patients (21%). We had a total of seven patients with proximal junctional fracture, even though no patients showed implant/bone interface failure with screw pullout, probably through the effect of PMMA. In contrast to the PJK cohort, six PJF patients all had varying degrees of neurologic deficits from modified Frankel grade C to D3, which recovered to grades D3 and to grade D2 in three patients each, after a revision operation of proximal extension of instrumented fusion with or without neural decompression. None of the possible demographic and radiologic risk factors showed statistical differences between the non-PJK/PJF, PJK, and PJF groups. Conclusions: Compared with the traditional open surgical approach used in the previous studies with a positive result for the prophylactic two-level cement augmentation, the MIS procedures with substantial benefits to patients in terms of less access-related morbidity and less blood loss also provide a greater segmental stability, which, however, may have a negative effect on the development of PJK/PJF.

• Publisher: MDPI AG,MDPI
• Subject: Adult / adult spinal deformity (ASD) / Adults / Aged / balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) / Bone Cements / Cardiovascular disease / Cement / Female / Humans / Incidence / Kyphosis - prevention & control / Kyphosis - surgery / long-segment fusion / Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery / Male / Medicine (General) / Middle Aged / minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) / Minimally invasive surgery / Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects / Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods / Patients / Pelvis / Polymethyl Methacrylate - administration & dosage / Polymethyl Methacrylate - therapeutic use / Postoperative Complications - prevention & control / prophylactic PMMA cement augmentation / proximal junctional kyphosis / R5-920 / Retrospective Studies / Spinal Fusion - adverse effects / Spinal Fusion - instrumentation / Spinal Fusion - methods / Surgery / Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery / Treatment Outcome / Vertebrae / Vertebroplasty - adverse effects / Vertebroplasty - methods