Journal Article

Gender and outcomes after primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)

Lampert, Rachel, Daugherty, Stacie L., Masoudi, Frederick A., Russo, Andrea M., Wang, Yongfei, Curtis, Jeptha

2015

Overview

Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected high-risk individuals. Because of small numbers of women enrolled in these trials, outcomes for women after hospital discharge have not been well described. We compared procedure-related complications and outcomes after hospital discharge between men and women undergoing single- or dual-chamber ICD implantation for primary prevention. In patients 65 years or older with Medicare fee-for-service coverage, we identified 38,912 initial implants (25% women) who received single- or dual-chamber ICDs for primary prevention between January 2006 and December 2009 in the NCDR and evaluated gender differences in outcomes. Women had greater comorbidity and more advanced heart failure (HF) at the time of ICD implantation than did men. Device-related complications, death at 6 months, all-cause readmissions, and HF readmissions at 6 months were significantly more common in women (7.2% vs 4.8%, 6.5% vs 5.6%, 37.2% vs 31.7%, and 14.0% vs 10.0% respectively; P < .001 for all). Women continued to have higher odds of procedural complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.53, P < .001), 6-month all-cause readmission (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28, P < .001), and 6-month HF readmission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.42, P < .001), with a trend toward higher 6-month mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.20, P = .123), compared with men, after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and device type (single vs dual chamber). Among older patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention in clinical practice, women experience worse outcomes than do men. Reasons for gender differences in outcomes are poorly understood and require further investigation.

• Publisher: Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
• Subject: Aged / Cardiology / Cardiovascular / Cardiovascular disease / Clinical medicine / Clinical trials / Death, Sudden, Cardiac - epidemiology / Death, Sudden, Cardiac - etiology / Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention & control / Defibrillators, Implantable / Female / Follow-Up Studies / Gender differences / Health maintenance organizations / Heart attacks / Heart Failure - mortality / Heart Failure - therapy / HMOs / Hospitalization / Humans / Male / Medicare / Mortality / Odds Ratio / Patients / Primary Prevention / Registries / Retrospective Studies / Risk Factors / Sex Distribution / Sex Factors / Time Factors / Treatment Outcome / United States - epidemiology / Womens health