MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients
Journal Article

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference as a prognostic tool in high-risk surgical patients

2015
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of high values of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PCO 2 gap) in high-risk surgical patients admitted to a postoperative ICU. We hypothesized that PCO 2 gap could serve as a useful tool to identify patients still requiring hemodynamic optimization at ICU admission. Methods One hundred and fifteen patients were included in this prospective single-center observational study during a 1-year period. High-risk surgical inclusion criteria were adapted from Schoemaker and colleagues. Demographic and biological data, PCO 2 gap, central venous oxygen saturation, lactate level and postoperative complications were recorded for all patients at ICU admission, and 6 hours and 12 hours after admission. Results A total of 78 (68%) patients developed postoperative complications, of whom 54 (47%) developed organ failure. From admission to 12 hours after admission, there was a significant difference in mean PCO 2 gap (8.7 ± 2.8 mmHg versus 5.1 ± 2.6 mmHg; P  = 0.001) and median lactate values (1.54 (1.1-3.2) mmol/l versus 1.06 (0.8-1.8) mmol/l; P  = 0.003) between patients who developed postoperative complications and those who did not. These differences were maximal at admission to the ICU. At ICU admission, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for occurrence of postoperative complications was 0.86 for the PCO 2 gap compared to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.82), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score (0.67), and lactate level (0.67). The threshold value for PCO 2 gap was 5.8 mmHg. Multivariate analysis showed that only a high PCO 2 gap and a high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independently associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. A high PCO 2 gap (≥6 mmHg) was associated with more organ failure, an increase in duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay. Conclusion A high PCO 2 gap at admission in the postoperative ICU was significantly associated with increased postoperative complications in high-risk surgical patients. If the increase in PCO 2 gap is secondary to tissue hypoperfusion then the PCO 2 gap might be a useful tool complementary to central venous oxygen saturation as a therapeutic target.