Journal Article

How do we define the policy impact of public health research? A systematic review

Alla, Kristel, Whiteford, Harvey A., Head, Brian W., Hall, Wayne D., Meurk, Carla S.

2017

Overview

Background In order to understand and measure the policy impact of research we need a definition of research impact that is suited to the task. This article systematically reviewed both peer-reviewed and grey literature for definitions of research impact to develop a definition of research impact that can be used to investigate how public health research influences policy. Method Keyword searches of the electronic databases Web of Science, ProQuest, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Google Scholar were conducted between August 2015 and April 2016. Keywords included ‘definition’ and ‘policy’ and ‘research impact’ or ‘research evidence’. The search terms ‘health’, public health’ or ‘mental health’ and ‘knowledge transfer’ or ‘research translation’ were used to focus the search on relevant health discipline approaches. Studies included in the review described processes, theories or frameworks associated with public health, health services or mental health policy. Results We identified 108 definitions in 83 publications. The key findings were that literature on research impact is growing, but only 23% of peer-reviewed publications on the topic explicitly defined the term and that the majority (76%) of definitions were derived from research organisations and funding institutions. We identified four main types of definition, namely (1) definitions that conceptualise research impacts in terms of positive changes or effects that evidence can bring about when transferred into policies (example Research Excellence Framework definition), (2) definitions that interpret research impacts as measurable outcomes (Research Councils UK), and (3) bibliometric and (4) use-based definitions. We identified four constructs underpinning these definitions that related to concepts of contribution, change, avenues and levels of impact. Conclusion The dominance of bureaucratic definitions, the tendency to discuss but not define the concept of research impact, and the heterogeneity of definitions confirm the need for conceptual clarity in this area. We propose a working definition of research impact that can be used in a range of health policy contexts.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Accountability / Analysis / Bibliometrics / Definitions / Evidence-informed policies / Grey literature / Health Administration / Health care policy / Health Policy / Health research / Health Services / Health Services Research / Humanities / Humans / Knowledge / Literature reviews / Management / Medical research / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mental health / Peer Review, Health Care / Policy / Policy impact / Public Health / Public services / R & D/Technology Policy / Research funding / Research impact / Research methodology / Review / Scientific papers / Scientometrics / Serial Publications / Social sciences / Systematic review