Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Do you wish to request the book?
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
2021
Overview
Background
Pragmatic trials often consist of cluster-randomized controlled trials (C-RCTs), where staff of existing clinics or sites deliver interventions and randomization occurs at the site level. Covariate-constrained randomization (CCR) methods are often recommended to minimize imbalance on important site characteristics across intervention and control arms because sizable imbalances can occur by chance in simple randomizations when the number of units to be randomized is relatively small. CCR methods involve multiple random assignments initially, an assessment of balance achieved on site-level covariates from each randomization, and the final selection of an allocation that produces acceptable balance. However, no clear consensus exists on how to assess imbalance or identify allocations with sufficient balance. In this article, we describe an overall imbalance index (
I
) that is based on the mean of the absolute value of the standardized differences in means on the site characteristics.
Methods
We derive the theoretical distribution of
I
, then conduct simulation studies to examine its empirical properties under the varying covariate distributions and inter-correlations.
Results
I
has an expected value of 0.798 and, assuming independent site characteristics, a variance of 0.363/
k
, where
k
is the number of site characteristics being balanced. Simulations indicated that the properties of
I
are robust under varying covariate circumstances as long as
k
is greater than 3 and the covariates are not too highly inter-correlated.
Conclusions
We recommend that values of
I
below the 10th percentile indicate sufficient overall site balance in CCRs. Definitions of acceptable randomizations might also include individual covariate criteria specified in advance, in addition to overall balance criteria.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
