MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study
Journal Article

Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study

2020
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Undetected depression is common in people with low vision and depression screening has been recommended. However, depression screening is a complex procedure for which low vision practitioners need training. This study examined the integration of routine depression screening, using two questions, and referral pathways into a national low vision service in Wales at 6 months following practitioner training, and identified key barriers to implementation. Methods This pre-post single group study employed a convergent mixed methods design to collect quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview data on low vision practitioners’ clinical practice and perceived barriers to implementing depression screening. Forty practitioners completed questionnaires pre-, immediately post- and 6 months post-training and nine engaged in interviews 6 months post-training. Ordinal questionnaire scores were Rasch-transformed into interval-level data before linear regression analyses were performed to determine the change in scores over time and the association between perceived barriers and clinical practice. Thematic Analysis was applied to the interviews and the narrative results merged with the questionnaire findings. Results Before training, only one third of practitioners ( n  = 15) identified depression in low vision patients, increasing to over 90% ( n  = 37) at 6 months post-training, with a corresponding increase in those using validated depression screening questions from 10% ( n  = 4) to 80% ( n  = 32). Six months post-training, practitioners reported taking significantly more action in response to suspected depression (difference in means = 2.77, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.61, p  < 0.001) and perceived less barriers to addressing depression (difference in means = − 0.95, 95% CI − 1.32 to − 0.59, p  < 0.001). However, the screening questions were not used consistently. Some barriers to implementation remained, including perceived patient reluctance to discuss depression, time constraints and lack of confidence in addressing depression. Conclusions The introduction of depression screening service guidelines and training successfully increased the number of low vision practitioners identifying and addressing depression. However, standardized screening of all low vision attendees has not yet been achieved and several barriers remain. Healthcare services need to address these barriers when considering mental health screening, and further research could focus on the process from the patients’ perspective, to determine the desire for and acceptability of screening.