Journal Article

Combining metabolome and clinical indicators with machine learning provides some promising diagnostic markers to precisely detect smear-positive/negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Tuohetaerbaike, Bahetibieke, Chen, Fei, Yang, Yefeng, Ju, Yingjiao, Yue, Liya, Zhang, Xiuli, Wang, Jing, Wen, Hao, Wang, Jie, Qimanguli, Wushou’er, Li, Ying, Li, Cuidan, Zhang, Wenbao, Chen, Changbin, Hu, Xin

2022

Overview

Background Tuberculosis (TB) had been the leading lethal infectious disease worldwide for a long time (2014–2019) until the COVID-19 global pandemic, and it is still one of the top 10 death causes worldwide. One important reason why there are so many TB patients and death cases in the world is because of the difficulties in precise diagnosis of TB using common detection methods, especially for some smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPT) cases. The rapid development of metabolome and machine learning offers a great opportunity for precision diagnosis of TB. However, the metabolite biomarkers for the precision diagnosis of smear-positive and smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SPPT/SNPT) remain to be uncovered. In this study, we combined metabolomics and clinical indicators with machine learning to screen out newly diagnostic biomarkers for the precise identification of SPPT and SNPT patients. Methods Untargeted plasma metabolomic profiling was performed for 27 SPPT patients, 37 SNPT patients and controls. The orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was then conducted to screen differential metabolites among the three groups. Metabolite enriched pathways, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM) and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) were performed using Metaboanalyst 5.0, “caret” R package, “e1071” R package and “Tensorflow” Python package, respectively. Results Metabolomic analysis revealed significant enrichment of fatty acid and amino acid metabolites in the plasma of SPPT and SNPT patients, where SPPT samples showed a more serious dysfunction in fatty acid and amino acid metabolisms. Further RF analysis revealed four optimized diagnostic biomarker combinations including ten features (two lipid/lipid-like molecules and seven organic acids/derivatives, and one clinical indicator) for the identification of SPPT, SNPT patients and controls with high accuracy (83–93%), which were further verified by SVM and MLP. Among them, MLP displayed the best classification performance on simultaneously precise identification of the three groups (94.74%), suggesting the advantage of MLP over RF/SVM to some extent. Conclusions Our findings reveal plasma metabolomic characteristics of SPPT and SNPT patients, provide some novel promising diagnostic markers for precision diagnosis of various types of TB, and show the potential of machine learning in screening out biomarkers from big data.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Amino acids / Biomarkers / Classification / COVID-19 / Diagnosis / Diagnostic biomarkers / Diagnostic systems / Discriminant analysis / Fatty acids / Hospitals / Indicators / Infectious Diseases / Internal Medicine / Learning algorithms / Lipids / Machine learning / Medical Microbiology / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Metabolites / Metabolomics / Methods / Microscopy / Multilayer perceptrons / Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) / Neural networks / Organic acids / Pandemics / Parasitology / Patients / Plasma / Pulmonary tuberculosis / Random forest / Smear-positive/negative pulmonary tuberculosis / Software / Support vector machines / Tropical Medicine / Tuberculosis / Tuberculosis (TB)