Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy
Do you wish to request the book?
A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy
2024
Overview
Background
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Monofix
®
-PDO compared to V-Loc™ for tumor bed suturing during robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN).
Methods
A randomized, controlled, multicenter, single-blinded trial was conducted across four tertiary institutions. Patients with T1-2 stage renal masses scheduled for RAPN were enrolled. The exclusion criteria included patients not deemed in need of bed suturing, those with a history of prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and those with severe systemic diseases or high bleeding tendencies. A total of 174 patients participated and were subjected to permuted block randomization (T1a vs. others), resulting in 88 patients in the V-Loc™ group and 86 in the Monofix
®
-PDO group. The primary outcome was the resection bed suture time. The secondary outcomes were total suture use time, warm ischemia time, console time (for efficacy), estimated blood loss, hemoglobin change, and 90-day treatment-related adverse events (for safety). All patients were scheduled for follow-up visits for up to three months postoperatively.
Results
The primary outcome, resection bed suture time, did not significantly differ between the V-Loc™ and Monofix
®
-PDO groups (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 2.6 min,
p
= 0.531). Secondary outcomes, including total suture used time (5.3 ± 2.8 vs. 4.8 ± 2.6 min,
p
= 0.289) and warm ischemic time (15.6 ± 5.5 vs. 15.4 ± 5.4 min,
p
= 0.834), were comparable between the two groups. In terms of safety outcomes, changes in serum hemoglobin levels did not show significant differences on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14 (
P
= 0.537, 0.353, and 0.840, respectively). No device-related adverse events were observed during the 90-day follow-up period in either group.
Conclusions
Monofix
®
-PDO demonstrated non-inferior to V-Loc in terms of both safety and efficacy in patients undergoing RAPN. This trial is registered on cris.nih.go.kr as KCT0006809 (Registration date: 02/19/2021).
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
/ Aged
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Female
/ Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
/ Humans
/ Ischemia
/ Laparoscopy - adverse effects
/ Male
/ Monofix
/ Nephrectomy - adverse effects
/ Oncology
/ Patients
/ Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
/ Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
/ Surgery
/ Suture Techniques - adverse effects
/ Suture Techniques - instrumentation
/ Sutures
/ Tumors
/ V-Loc
