Journal Article

Conflicts of interest disclosure policies among Chinese medical journals: A cross-sectional study

Sun, Ji, Zhu, Jiayi

2019

Overview

Conflicts of interest (COI) disclosure policies are critical to enhancing the integrity of research. However, it is unclear how Chinese medical journals interpret and enforce such policies. The goal of this investigation is to determine the current status of COI disclosure policy enforcement in Chinese medical journals and to promote comprehensive COI policies. In this cross-sectional study conducted from September 1st to October 29th 2017, journal instructions, websites and print issues of journals indexed by the Core Journals of China (version 2014), in the medical and health sector, were reviewed to identify whether COI disclosure policies existed and how complete these policies were. Of 248 eligible journals, 78 (31%) mentioned COI policies; 9 (4%) applied standardized disclosure forms; 18 (7%) required disclosure statements in articles; 4 (2%) mentioned policy bases; none validated disclosed COIs; 2 (1%) mentioned how they dealt with breaches; 18 (7%) involved the management of disclosed COIs; and 62 (25%) and 55 (22%) noted financial and nonfinancial COIs, respectively. Seventy-eight journals (31%) mentioned COIs in research and authors' obligation towards disclosure; 2 (1%) and 6 (2%) mentioned family members' and institutional COIs, respectively. Twenty-two and 11 journals mentioned at least one form of financial and nonfinancial COI type in research, respectively. Seven journals (3%) required disclosure of the source of financial support in research, but no journals mentioned the amount of support. Seven (3%) and 12 (5%) journals mentioned COIs in the editorial process and peer-review, respectively. Clinical journals (45%) paid more attention to COI policies than non-clinical journals. Approximately one-third of Chinese medical journals had COI policies, and of the journals that mentioned financial COIs most required nonfinancial COIs. However, the extent to which journals implemented COI policies was insufficient. There is a generic lack of standardized disclosure forms and management of COIs in most journals. The subject and details of COIs involved in the editorial and peer-review process received less attention than those in research.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Bibliographic data bases / China / Conflict of Interest - legislation & jurisprudence / Conflicts of interest / Cross-Sectional Studies / Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence / Disclosure of information / Editorial Policies / Editorials / Ethical aspects / Generic drugs / Humans / Laws, regulations and rules / Medical journals / Medical research / Medical Writing / Medicine / Medicine and Health Sciences / Peer review / Periodicals as Topic / Policies / Research and Analysis Methods / Scholarly publishing / Science Policy / Social Sciences / Studies / Web sites / Web sites (World Wide Web) / Websites