Journal Article

An empirical comparison of population genetic analyses using microsatellite and SNP data for a species of conservation concern

Oyler-McCance, Sara J., Zimmerman, Shawna J., Aldridge, Cameron L.

2020

Overview

Background Use of genomic tools to characterize wildlife populations has increased in recent years. In the past, genetic characterization has been accomplished with more traditional genetic tools (e.g., microsatellites). The explosion of genomic methods and the subsequent creation of large SNP datasets has led to the promise of increased precision in population genetic parameter estimates and identification of demographically and evolutionarily independent groups, as well as questions about the future usefulness of the more traditional genetic tools. At present, few empirical comparisons of population genetic parameters and clustering analyses performed with microsatellites and SNPs have been conducted. Results Here we used microsatellite and SNP data generated from Gunnison sage-grouse ( Centrocercus minimus ) samples to evaluate concordance of the results obtained from each dataset for common metrics of genetic diversity ( H O , H E , F IS , A R ) and differentiation ( F ST , G ST , D Jost ). Additionally, we evaluated clustering of individuals using putatively neutral (SNPs and microsatellites), putatively adaptive, and a combined dataset of putatively neutral and adaptive loci. We took particular interest in the conservation implications of any differences. Generally, we found high concordance between microsatellites and SNPs for H E , F IS , A R , and all differentiation estimates. Although there was strong correlation between metrics from SNPs and microsatellites, the magnitude of the diversity and differentiation metrics were quite different in some cases. Clustering analyses also showed similar patterns, though SNP data was able to cluster individuals into more distinct groups. Importantly, clustering analyses with SNP data suggest strong demographic independence among the six distinct populations of Gunnison sage-grouse with some indication of evolutionary independence in two or three populations; a finding that was not revealed by microsatellite data. Conclusion We demonstrate that SNPs have three main advantages over microsatellites: more precise estimates of population-level diversity, higher power to identify groups in clustering methods, and the ability to consider local adaptation. This study adds to a growing body of work comparing the use of SNPs and microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and differentiation for a species of conservation concern with relatively high population structure and using the most common method of obtaining SNP genotypes for non-model organisms.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Animal Genetics and Genomics / Animals / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Birds - genetics / Chromosomes / Cluster Analysis / Clustering / Comparative analysis / Confidence intervals / Conservation / Conservation of Natural Resources / Datasets / Deoxyribonucleic acid / Differentiation / DNA / Empirical analysis / Endangered & extinct species / Estimates / Evolution / Evolution, Molecular / Evolutionarily significant units / Genetic analysis / Genetic aspects / Genetic diversity / Genetics, Population / Genomes / Genomics / Genotypes / Grouse / Identification methods / Life Sciences / Microarrays / Microbial Genetics and Genomics / Microsatellite Repeats - genetics / Microsatellites / Mutation / Non-human and non-rodent vertebrate genomics / Parameter estimation / Parameter identification / Plant Genetics and Genomics / Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Population genetics / Population statistics / Population structure / Proteomics / Research Article / Single nucleotide polymorphisms / Single-nucleotide polymorphism / Wildlife / Wildlife conservation