Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification
by
Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Area under the curve
/ AUC
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Classification
/ Classifiers
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Computer applications
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data mining
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Data science
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Receiver operating characteristic curve
/ ROC
/ ROC AUC
/ Sensitivity
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification
by
Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Area under the curve
/ AUC
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Classification
/ Classifiers
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Computer applications
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data mining
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Data science
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Receiver operating characteristic curve
/ ROC
/ ROC AUC
/ Sensitivity
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification
by
Chicco, Davide
, Jurman, Giuseppe
in
Algorithms
/ Analysis
/ Area under the curve
/ AUC
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Classification
/ Classifiers
/ Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
/ Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
/ Computer applications
/ Correlation coefficient
/ Correlation coefficients
/ Data mining
/ Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
/ Data science
/ Life Sciences
/ Machine learning
/ Matthews correlation coefficient
/ Methodology
/ Receiver operating characteristic curve
/ ROC
/ ROC AUC
/ Sensitivity
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification
Journal Article
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Binary classification is a common task for which machine learning and computational statistics are used, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) has become the common standard metric to evaluate binary classifications in most scientific fields. The ROC curve has
true positive rate
(also called
sensitivity
or
recall
) on the
y
axis and false positive rate on the
x
axis, and the ROC AUC can range from 0 (worst result) to 1 (perfect result). The ROC AUC, however, has several flaws and drawbacks. This score is generated including predictions that obtained insufficient sensitivity and specificity, and moreover it does not say anything about
positive predictive value
(also known as
precision
) nor negative predictive value (NPV) obtained by the classifier, therefore potentially generating inflated overoptimistic results. Since it is common to include ROC AUC alone without precision and negative predictive value, a researcher might erroneously conclude that their classification was successful. Furthermore, a given point in the ROC space does not identify a single confusion matrix nor a group of matrices sharing the same MCC value. Indeed, a given
(sensitivity, specificity)
pair can cover a broad MCC range, which casts doubts on the reliability of ROC AUC as a performance measure. In contrast, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) generates a high score in its
[
-
1
;
+
1
]
interval only if the classifier scored a high value for all the four
basic rates
of the confusion matrix: sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive value. A high MCC (for example, MCC
=
0.9), moreover, always corresponds to a high ROC AUC, and not vice versa. In this short study, we explain why the Matthews correlation coefficient should replace the ROC AUC as standard statistic in all the scientific studies involving a binary classification, in all scientific fields.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.