Journal Article

A Canadian survey of residency applicants’ and interviewers’ perceptions of the 2021 CaRMS R1 virtual interviews

Relke, Nicole, Soleas, Eleftherios, Zevin, Boris, Del Fernandes, Rosephine, Lui, Clementine Janet Pui Man, Braund, Heather

2023

Overview

Background All Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) R1 interviews were conducted virtually for the first time in 2021. We explored the facilitators, barriers, and implications of the virtual interview process for the CaRMS R1 match and provide recommendations for improvement. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of CaRMS R1 residency applicants and interviewers across Canada in 2021. Surveys were distributed by email to the interviewers, and by email, social media, or newsletter to the applicants. Inductive thematic analysis was used for open-ended items. Recommendations were provided as frequencies to demonstrate strength. Close-ended items were described and compared across groups using Chi-Square Fisher’s Exact tests. Results A total of 127 applicants and 400 interviewers, including 127 program directors, responded to the survey. 193/380 (50.8%) interviewers and 90/118 (76.3%) applicants preferred virtual over in-person interview formats. Facilitators of the virtual interview format included cost and time savings, ease of scheduling, reduced environmental impact, greater equity, less stress, greater reach and participation, and safety. Barriers of the virtual interview format included reduced informal conversations, limited ability for applicants to explore programs at different locations, limited ability for programs to assess applicants’ interest, technological issues, concern for interview integrity, limited non-verbal communication, and reduced networking. The most helpful media for applicants to learn about residency programs were program websites, the CaRMS/AFMC websites, and recruitment videos. Additionally, panel interviews were preferred by applicants for their ability to showcase themselves and build connections with multiple interviewers. Respondents provided recommendations regarding: (1) dissemination of program information, (2) the use of technology, and (3) the virtual interview format. Conclusions Perceptions of 2021 CaRMS R1 virtual interviews were favourable among applicants and interviewers. Recommendations from this study can help improve future iterations of virtual interviews.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Analysis / Barriers / Canada / CaRMS / Coding / Communication / Cross-Sectional Studies / Curricula / Directors / Education / Electronic Mail / Faculty interviewer / Feedback (Response) / Health surveys / Humans / Internal medicine / Internship and Residency / Interviewing / Interviews / Likert Scales / Literature Reviews / Medical applicant / Medical Education / Medical research / Medical schools / Medical students / Medicine / Preferences / R1 interviews / Researchers / Residency Interviews / Residency Match / Social Media / Social networks / Surveys and Questionnaires / Technology application / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Videoconferencing