Journal Article

Who is research serving? A systematic realist review of circumpolar environment-related Indigenous health literature

Cunsolo, Ashlee, Harper, Sherilee L., Jones, Jen

2018

Overview

Addressing factors leading to health disparities in the Circumpolar North require approaches that consider and address the social determinants of health including on-going colonization. Today, colonization and related policies and processes, continue to manifest in the marginalization of Indigenous knowledge, particularly its use in research; however, Indigenous populations have moved from being research subjects to leaders and consumers of environmental health research. Given the tensions that exist between how health research is conducted, how the results are mobilized, and who has control and access to the results, we examine how peer-reviewed environment-related Indigenous health research in the Circumpolar North is serving the needs of Indigenous communities, governments, and organizations. A modified systematic-realist literature review was conducted. Three databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature published from 2000 to 2015. Articles were included if the research focused on the intersection of the environment and health in Northern Canada and/or Alaska. A total of 960 unique records were screened for relevance, and 210 articles were analysed. Of these relevant articles, 19% discussed how Indigenous peoples were engaged in the research. There was a significant increase in reporting participatory, community-based methods over time; the proportion of articles reporting community-engagement varied by research topic; quantitative research articles were significantly less likely to report community-engaged methods; and most articles did not clearly report how the results were shared with the community. The results raise a number of questions for the field of Circumpolar environment-related Indigenous health research, including whether or how authors of peer-reviewed literature should (or should not) be obliged to describe how research is serving Northern Indigenous communities. The results are intended to stimulate further conversations and bridge perceived dichotomies of quantitative/qualitative, Western/Indigenous, and empirical/community driven research approaches, as well as underlying assumptions that frame health research.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Access control / Biomedical Research - standards / Climate change / Colonialism / Colonization / Community / Community involvement / Community participation / Community research / Consumer research / Consumers / Databases, Bibliographic / Dichotomies / Empirical analysis / Environment / Environmental Health / Environmental research / Health aspects / Health disparities / Health research / Health Services, Indigenous / Humans / Indigenous knowledge / Indigenous peoples / Literature reviews / Local knowledge / Marginality / Medical research / Medicine and Health Sciences / Native peoples / Peers / People and Places / Population Groups - statistics & numerical data / Public health / Quantitative analysis / Quantitative research / Research and Analysis Methods / Research methodology / Research Subjects / Researchers / Reviews / Social determinants of health / Social Environment / Social exclusion / Social factors / Social Sciences / Translational Research, Biomedical