Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
by
Park, Inkyung
, Smith, Andrew R.
, Scherer, Aaron M.
, Rule, Shanon
, Stuart, Jillian O.
, Windschitl, Paul D.
in
Analysis
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Brain
/ Brain research
/ Context
/ Decision making
/ Gambling
/ Health risks
/ Influence
/ Learning
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Paradigms
/ Physical Sciences
/ Psychology
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk perception
/ Risk-taking (Psychology)
/ Social Sciences
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
by
Park, Inkyung
, Smith, Andrew R.
, Scherer, Aaron M.
, Rule, Shanon
, Stuart, Jillian O.
, Windschitl, Paul D.
in
Analysis
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Brain
/ Brain research
/ Context
/ Decision making
/ Gambling
/ Health risks
/ Influence
/ Learning
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Paradigms
/ Physical Sciences
/ Psychology
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk perception
/ Risk-taking (Psychology)
/ Social Sciences
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
by
Park, Inkyung
, Smith, Andrew R.
, Scherer, Aaron M.
, Rule, Shanon
, Stuart, Jillian O.
, Windschitl, Paul D.
in
Analysis
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Brain
/ Brain research
/ Context
/ Decision making
/ Gambling
/ Health risks
/ Influence
/ Learning
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Paradigms
/ Physical Sciences
/ Psychology
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Risk perception
/ Risk-taking (Psychology)
/ Social Sciences
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
Journal Article
Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
When making decisions involving risk, people may learn about the risk from descriptions or from experience. The description-experience gap refers to the difference in decision patterns driven by this discrepancy in learning format. Across two experiments, we investigated whether learning from description versus experience differentially affects the direction and the magnitude of a context effect in risky decision making. In Study 1 and 2, a computerized game called the Decisions about Risk Task (DART) was used to measure people’s risk-taking tendencies toward hazard stimuli that exploded probabilistically. The rate at which a context hazard caused harm was manipulated, while the rate at which a focal hazard caused harm was held constant. The format by which this information was learned was also manipulated; it was learned primarily by experience or by description. The results revealed that participants’ behavior toward the focal hazard varied depending on what they had learned about the context hazard. Specifically, there were contrast effects in which participants were more likely to choose a risky behavior toward the focal hazard when the harm rate posed by the context hazard was high rather than low. Critically, these contrast effects were of similar strength irrespective of whether the risk information was learned from experience or description. Participants’ verbal assessments of risk likelihood also showed contrast effects, irrespective of learning format. Although risk information about a context hazard in DART does nothing to affect the objective expected value of risky versus safe behaviors toward focal hazards, it did affect participants’ perceptions and behaviors—regardless of whether the information was learned from description or experience. Our findings suggest that context has a broad-based role in how people assess and make decisions about hazards.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.