Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?
Do you wish to request the book?
Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?
2016
Overview
Clarity of the transplanted tissue and restoration of visual acuity are the two primary metrics for evaluating the success of corneal transplantation. Participation of the transplanted eye in habitual binocular viewing is seldom evaluated post-operatively. In unilateral corneal disease, the transplanted eye may remain functionally inactive during binocular viewing due to its suboptimal visual acuity and poor image quality, vis-à-vis the healthy fellow eye.
This study prospectively quantified the contribution of the transplanted eye towards habitual binocular viewing in 25 cases with unilateral transplants [40 yrs (IQR: 32-42 yrs) and 25 age-matched controls [30 yrs (25-37 yrs)]. Binocular functions including visual field extent, high-contrast logMAR acuity, suppression threshold and stereoacuity were assessed using standard psychophysical paradigms. Optical quality of all eyes was determined from wavefront aberrometry measurements. Binocular visual field expanded by a median 21% (IQR: 18-29%) compared to the monocular field of cases and controls (p = 0.63). Binocular logMAR acuity [0.0 (0.0-0.0)] almost always followed the fellow eye's acuity [0.00 (0.00 --0.02)] (r = 0.82), independent of the transplanted eye's acuity [0.34 (0.2-0.5)] (r = 0.04). Suppression threshold and stereoacuity were poorer in cases [30.1% (13.5-44.3%); 620.8 arc sec (370.3-988.2 arc sec)] than in controls [79% (63.5-100%); 16.3 arc sec (10.6-25.5 arc sec)] (p<0.001). Higher-order wavefront aberrations of the transplanted eye [0.34 μ (0.21-0.51 μ)] were higher than the fellow eye [0.07 μ (0.05-0.11 μ)] (p<0.001) and their reduction with RGP contact lenses [0.09 μ (0.08-0.12 μ)] significantly improved the suppression threshold [65% (50-72%)] and stereoacuity [56.6 arc sec (47.7-181.6 arc sec)] (p<0.001).
In unilateral corneal disease, the transplanted eye does participate in gross binocular viewing but offers limited support to fine levels of binocularity. Improvement in the transplanted eye's optics enhances its participation in binocular viewing. Current metrics of this treatment success can expand to include measures of binocularity to assess the functional benefit of the transplantation process in unilateral corneal disease.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.