Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
by
Mann, Rachel
, Gilbody, Simon M.
, Adamson, Joy
in
Adult
/ Depression, Mental
/ Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis
/ Depression, Postpartum - psychology
/ Diagnosis
/ Female
/ Health aspects
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Interview, Psychological - methods
/ Mental depression
/ Perinatal care
/ Perinatal Care - methods
/ Pregnant women
/ Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
/ Psychological aspects
/ Self Report
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Studies
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
by
Mann, Rachel
, Gilbody, Simon M.
, Adamson, Joy
in
Adult
/ Depression, Mental
/ Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis
/ Depression, Postpartum - psychology
/ Diagnosis
/ Female
/ Health aspects
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Interview, Psychological - methods
/ Mental depression
/ Perinatal care
/ Perinatal Care - methods
/ Pregnant women
/ Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
/ Psychological aspects
/ Self Report
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Studies
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2012
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
by
Mann, Rachel
, Gilbody, Simon M.
, Adamson, Joy
in
Adult
/ Depression, Mental
/ Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis
/ Depression, Postpartum - psychology
/ Diagnosis
/ Female
/ Health aspects
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Interview, Psychological - methods
/ Mental depression
/ Perinatal care
/ Perinatal Care - methods
/ Pregnant women
/ Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
/ Psychological aspects
/ Self Report
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Studies
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
Journal Article
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Guidelines for perinatal mental health care recommend the use of two case-finding questions about depressed feelings and loss of interest in activities, despite the absence of validation studies in this context. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of these questions and of a third question about the need for help asked of women receiving perinatal care.
We evaluated self-reported responses to two case-finding questions against an interviewer-assessed diagnostic standard (DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder) among 152 women receiving antenatal care at 26–28 weeks' gestation and postnatal care at 5–13 weeks after delivery. Among women who answered “yes” to either question, we assessed the usefulness of asking a third question about the need for help. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for the two case-finding questions and for the added question about the need for help.
Antenatally, the two case-finding questions had a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77%–100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI 58%–76%), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.03 (95% CI 2.28–4.02) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.041 (95% CI 0.003–0.63) in identifying perinatal depression. Postnatal results were similar. Among the women who screened positive antenatally, the additional question about the need for help had a sensitivity of 58% (95% CI 38%–76%), a specificity of 91% (95% CI 78%–97%), a positive likelihood ratio of 6.86 (95% CI 2.16–21.7) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.45 (95% CI 0.25–0.80), with lower sensitivity and higher specificity postnatally.
Negative responses to both of the case-finding questions showed acceptable accuracy for ruling out perinatal depression. For positive responses, the use of a third question about the need for help improved specificity and the ability to rule in depression.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,CMA Impact Inc,Joule Inc,CMA Impact, Inc,Canadian Medical Association
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.