Journal Article

Screens in fly and beetle reveal vastly divergent gene sets required for developmental processes

Klingler, Martin, Kessel, Tobias, Siemanowski, Janna, Frasch, Manfred, Teuscher, Matthias, Weißkopf, Matthias, Wan, Xuebin, Roth, Siegfried, Schultheis, Dorothea, Schoppmeier, Michael, Großmann, Daniela, Ansari, Salim, Dönitz, Jürgen, Hakeemi, Muhammad Salim, Bucher, Gregor

2022

Overview

Background Most of the known genes required for developmental processes have been identified by genetic screens in a few well-studied model organisms, which have been considered representative of related species, and informative—to some degree—for human biology. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a prime model for insect genetics, and while conservation of many gene functions has been observed among bilaterian animals, a plethora of data show evolutionary divergence of gene function among more closely-related groups, such as within the insects. A quantification of conservation versus divergence of gene functions has been missing, without which it is unclear how representative data from model systems actually are. Results Here, we systematically compare the gene sets required for a number of homologous but divergent developmental processes between fly and beetle in order to quantify the difference of the gene sets. To that end, we expanded our RNAi screen in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum to cover more than half of the protein-coding genes. Then we compared the gene sets required for four different developmental processes between beetle and fly. We found that around 50% of the gene functions were identified in the screens of both species while for the rest, phenotypes were revealed only in fly (~ 10%) or beetle (~ 40%) reflecting both technical and biological differences. Accordingly, we were able to annotate novel developmental GO terms for 96 genes studied in this work. With this work, we publish the final dataset for the pupal injection screen of the iBeetle screen reaching a coverage of 87% (13,020 genes). Conclusions We conclude that the gene sets required for a homologous process diverge more than widely believed. Hence, the insights gained in flies may be less representative for insects or protostomes than previously thought, and work in complementary model systems is required to gain a comprehensive picture. The RNAi screening resources developed in this project, the expanding transgenic toolkit, and our large-scale functional data make T. castaneum an excellent model system in that endeavor.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Animals / Annotations / Arthropods / Beetles / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Coleoptera - genetics / Comparative genomics / Conservation genetics / Datasets / Developmental genetics / Divergence / Drosophila / Drosophila melanogaster / Drosophila melanogaster - genetics / Evolution / Fruit-flies / Gene function / Genes / Genetic aspects / Genetic screening / Genetics / Genomes / Homology / iBeetle / Identification and classification / Insects / Life Sciences / Methods / Ontology / Organisms / Phenotypes / Pupa / Research Article / RNA Interference / RNA-mediated interference / RNAi screen / Tribolium - genetics / Tribolium castaneum