MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification
Journal Article

Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment: Multi-Class Object Detection vs. Object Localization and Classification

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
What are the main findings? * Separating building localization from damage classification outperforms multi-class detection on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) orthomosaics of post-cyclone Mozambique and provides stronger single-class localization. * Transfer learning remains consistently beneficial despite the domain gap between COCO/ImageNet and UAV disaster imagery, indicating that generic mid-level features transfer well to this task. Separating building localization from damage classification outperforms multi-class detection on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) orthomosaics of post-cyclone Mozambique and provides stronger single-class localization. Transfer learning remains consistently beneficial despite the domain gap between COCO/ImageNet and UAV disaster imagery, indicating that generic mid-level features transfer well to this task. What are the implications of the main findings? * A modular two-stage pipeline improves robustness and adaptability for real-world deployments, enabling independent optimization, rapid component swaps, and straightforward extension to new damage taxonomies, geographies, or sensing conditions without full retraining. * By strengthening localization and dedicating classification, the approach better handles challenging, imbalanced classes (e.g., destroyed buildings) and shows improved robustness on non-Western, underrepresented built environments—facilitating more reliable, scalable post-disaster assessment across diverse global contexts. A modular two-stage pipeline improves robustness and adaptability for real-world deployments, enabling independent optimization, rapid component swaps, and straightforward extension to new damage taxonomies, geographies, or sensing conditions without full retraining. By strengthening localization and dedicating classification, the approach better handles challenging, imbalanced classes (e.g., destroyed buildings) and shows improved robustness on non-Western, underrepresented built environments—facilitating more reliable, scalable post-disaster assessment across diverse global contexts. Natural disasters demand swift and accurate impact assessment, yet traditional field-based methods remain prohibitively slow. While semi-automatic techniques leveraging remote sensing and drone imagery have accelerated evaluations, existing datasets predominantly emphasize Western infrastructure, offering limited representation of African contexts. The EDDA dataset (a Mozambique post-disaster building damage dataset developed under the Efficient Humanitarian Aid Through Intelligent Image Analysis project), addresses this critical gap by capturing rural and urban damage patterns in Mozambique following Cyclone Idai. Despite encouraging early results, significant challenges persist due to task complexity, severe class imbalance, and substantial architectural diversity across regions. Building upon EDDA, this study introduces a two-stage building damage assessment pipeline that decouples localization from classification. We employ lightweight You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based detectors—RTMDet, YOLOv7, and YOLOv8—for building localization, followed by dedicated damage severity classification using state-of-the-art architectures including Compact Convolutional Transformers, EfficientNet, and ResNet. This approach tests whether separating feature extraction tasks—assigning detectors solely to localization and specialized classifiers to damage assessment—yields superior performance compared to multi-class detection models that jointly learn both objectives. Comprehensive evaluation across 640+ model combinations demonstrates that our two-stage pipeline achieves competitive performance (mAP 0.478) with enhanced modularity compared to multi-class detection baselines (mAP 0.455), offering improved robustness across diverse building types and imbalanced damage classes.