MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples
Journal Article

Factors affecting detection and quantification of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Building on our previous work showing that pooled urine testing can rapidly detect Schistosoma haematobium infections but has limited sensitivity in low-intensity settings or with large pool sizes, this study evaluated how urine volume, pool size, infection intensity, and diagnostic method affect the detection and quantification of S. haematobium eggs in pooled samples. Between July 2022 and April 2023, 2,134 urine samples from school-age children living in three regional states of Ethiopia were individually examined by deploying urine filtration microscopy (UFM). Subsequently, 5, 10, 20 and 40 individual samples were strategically pooled and examined by deploying UFM and Fluke Catcher (FC) and varying volumes of urine (10, 20 and 30 mL). UFM was significantly more sensitive than FC for detecting S. haematobium eggs in pooled urine samples ([Formula: see text] =0.83, p < 0.001). There were significant interactions between the mean log of urine egg count (UEC) and volume of urine ([Formula: see text] =0.01, p = 0.021) or pool size ([Formula: see text] =-0.02, p = 0.007) for detecting S. haematobium eggs in pooled samples. The odds of detecting eggs in pooled samples in which the mean UEC of individual samples equaled 10 eggs/mL were 0.78 (95% CI:0.67-0.90) and 0.60 (95% CI:0.51-0.76) times lower when 10 mL rather than 20 mL and 30 mL was examined, respectively. There was a moderate or strong positive correlation between the mean egg count of pooled samples and the average egg count of the individual samples making the pools when pool sizes were 5, 10 or 20 (r ≥ 0.5). The diagnostic sensitivity of pooled testing for diagnosing S. haematobium infection is affected by a complex interplay between the pool size, the volume of urine examined, the mean UEC and the diagnostic method. The sensitivity of the pooled testing strategy may increase with larger urine volumes, higher infection intensity, and when UFM (rather than FC) is used for testing. However, sensitivity could decrease as the pool size increases. Use of UFM, larger urine volumes and smaller to moderate pool sizes could improve detection of S. haematobium infection in surveillance and mass deworming programs in low-intensity settings.