Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
KONČNOST KOT TEMELJ SAMOLASTNE BITI-V-SVETU
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
KONČNOST KOT TEMELJ SAMOLASTNE BITI-V-SVETU
Do you wish to request the book?
KONČNOST KOT TEMELJ SAMOLASTNE BITI-V-SVETU
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
KONČNOST KOT TEMELJ SAMOLASTNE BITI-V-SVETU
2019
Overview
Nato podam eksplikacijo pojma samolastnosti ter predstavim problem celosti tubiti in razgrnem, v kaksni zvezi je s temo samolastnosti. Vendar s tem bit-v-svetu se ni zajeta v celoti in glede na samolastno razumevanje, kakor kaze problem smrti tubiti. Abstract In the article I attempt to show in what way and in what sense finitude is the ground of the authentic being-in-the-world, insofar as it is thought existentially. [...]I offer, first, an explication of the concept of being-in-the-world, with regards to its constitutive moments of worldliness, understanding, and feeling. [...]I turn to the concept of authenticity and present the problem of the wholneness of Dasein, and how it is connected with authenticity. The interpretation of existential structures is guided by the idea of the correlation between understanding and being-meaning, which lies in each existential, insofar as it concerns the structure of such a relation. Uvod V pricujocem clanku je za vodilo interpretacije smiselnega sklopa biti-vsvetu, tesnobe, skrbi in koncnosti vzeta ideja korelacijskega ustroja fenomena tu-biti. Pri tern je potrebno dodati, da gre, ko govorimo o korelaciji, za formalizacijo zavoljo preglednosti oziroma da ta korelacija ni zgolj logicna forma razmerja subjekt-objekt, zavesti in dozivljajev, ampak je izpolnjena s fenomenalnim smislom, izkazanim v hermenevtiki vsakdanjega nacina biti-v-svetu. Smisel namrec sploh ne more imeti pomena, ce necesa ne zadeva in na nekaj ne napotuje - prirocnost je lahko smiselna le za neko potrebo, prisotnost je lahko smiselna le za neko opazovanje, namembnost le za neko namenjenost itd. Tu vendar ne gre za intencionalno naperjenost nekega logicno enotnega subjekta na dolocen logicno enoten objekt, h kateremu bi ta subjekt tezil kot k pogoju za izpolnitev kaksnega svojega akta. Brez ohranitve ideje korelacije namrec ni smiselne samostojnosti tubiti in sveta in tako tudi nobenega kriterija pristojnosti analize za pojasnitev razmerja razumevanja in sveta, vse se raztopi v tubiti kot enotni strukturi. Cesar se je tu treba varovati, je, da bi s tern nacin in moznost tega korelacijskega razmerja tubiti in smisla biti ze imeli za pojasnjenega ali celo za samorazvidnega.
