Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
THE SAVAGE CONSTITUTION
by
Ablavsky, Gregory
in
18th century AD
/ Confederation
/ Constitutional conventions
/ Constitutional history
/ Constitutions
/ Continental congresses
/ Federal government
/ Federal law
/ Government
/ Indians of North America
/ Interstate commerce
/ Law and legislation
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Native Americans
/ Remedies (Law)
/ Social aspects
/ Treaties
/ Tribal land
/ Tribal nations
/ U.S. states
/ United States history
/ War
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
THE SAVAGE CONSTITUTION
by
Ablavsky, Gregory
in
18th century AD
/ Confederation
/ Constitutional conventions
/ Constitutional history
/ Constitutions
/ Continental congresses
/ Federal government
/ Federal law
/ Government
/ Indians of North America
/ Interstate commerce
/ Law and legislation
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Native Americans
/ Remedies (Law)
/ Social aspects
/ Treaties
/ Tribal land
/ Tribal nations
/ U.S. states
/ United States history
/ War
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
THE SAVAGE CONSTITUTION
by
Ablavsky, Gregory
in
18th century AD
/ Confederation
/ Constitutional conventions
/ Constitutional history
/ Constitutions
/ Continental congresses
/ Federal government
/ Federal law
/ Government
/ Indians of North America
/ Interstate commerce
/ Law and legislation
/ Laws, regulations and rules
/ Native Americans
/ Remedies (Law)
/ Social aspects
/ Treaties
/ Tribal land
/ Tribal nations
/ U.S. states
/ United States history
/ War
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
THE SAVAGE CONSTITUTION
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Conventional histories of the Constitution largely omit Natives. This Article challenges this absence and argues that Indian affairs played a key role in the Constitution's creation, drafting, and ratification. It traces two constitutional narratives about Indians: a Madisonian and a Hamiltonian perspective. Both views arose from the failure of Indian policy under the Articles of Confederation, when explicit national authority could not constrain states, squatters, or Native nations. Nationalists agreed that this failure underscored the need for a stronger federal state, but disagreed about the explanation. Madisonians blamed interference with federal treaties, whereas the Hamiltonians argued the federal military was too weak to overawe the \"savages.\" Both accounts resulted in constitutional remedies. More important than the Indian Commerce Clause, new provisions secured by the Madisonians declared federal treaties supreme law, barred state treatymaking, and provided exclusive federal power over western territories. But expansionist states won concessions guaranteeing federal protection and western land claims, while other provisions created a fiscal-military state committed to western expansion. The two narratives fared differently during ratification. While few embraced centralization, many Federalists repeatedly invoked \"savages\" to justify a stronger federal state and a standing army. This argument swayed Georgia, which ratified to secure federal aid in its ongoing war with the Creek Indians. But it also elevated the dispossession of Natives into a constitutional principle. The Article concludes by exploring this history's interpretive implications. It suggests the Indian affairs context unsettles conventional understandings of the Constitution as intended to restrain the power of the state, and challenges both originalist and progressive assumptions about constitutional history.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.