MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions
Journal Article

Effect of Using Potassium Silicate and Novo Safe Compound against Wheat Gall Nematode in pot experiment under field-like conditions

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A field experiment was conducted using a pot that included a study of the effect of using Potassium Silicate and Novo safe against the wheat galls disease (Anguina tritici) on Sham 6 wheat. The results of the study showed that the treatment of PS and NS improved plant vegetative parameters and increased productivity. It also reduced nematode infection. The (NS + PS)2 treatment showed the highest average for plant high 65.26 cm, compared with Control treatment 49.66 cm. The (NS + PS)2 treatment also recorded a significant difference in leaf area recorded 33.99 cm2, compared with CT 26.29 cm2. The (NS + PS)2 treatment and the PS2 treatment recorded the highest average for 1000 grain weight, which recorded 39.66 and 39.73 g, respectively, compared with CT treatment, which recorded 14.16 g. The PS2 treatment, NS + PS 2 treatment and NS2 compound also recorded a reduction in infection standard, they recorded a significant difference for the average gall weight, which recorded 3.36, 3.43 and 3.93 gall/mg, respectively, compared with CT which recorded 6.25 gall/mg. PS2 treatment also recorded the lowest average for the percentage of spikes infection which recorded 61.53%, which differ significantly from the other treatments Except for the NS2 that didn’t record a difference, compared with CT which recorded the highest average spikes infection 85%. treatments of PS1, NS2, and (NS + PS)2 also achieved significant differences in the percentage of infected grains, recording 20.92, 22.34, 23.59, and 22.43%, respectively, compared with CT, which recorded 72.5%.