Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment
by
Ludwig, Jens
, Harcourt, Bernard E.
in
Affordable housing
/ Arrest rates
/ Arrests
/ Broken windows theory
/ Cities
/ Crime
/ Criminal arrests
/ Criminal statistics
/ Experiments
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact analysis
/ Law enforcement
/ Low income groups
/ Misdemeanor offenses
/ Neighborhoods
/ Police
/ Police services
/ Property crimes
/ Public housing
/ Social research
/ Studies
/ Urban crime
/ Violent crimes
2006
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment
by
Ludwig, Jens
, Harcourt, Bernard E.
in
Affordable housing
/ Arrest rates
/ Arrests
/ Broken windows theory
/ Cities
/ Crime
/ Criminal arrests
/ Criminal statistics
/ Experiments
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact analysis
/ Law enforcement
/ Low income groups
/ Misdemeanor offenses
/ Neighborhoods
/ Police
/ Police services
/ Property crimes
/ Public housing
/ Social research
/ Studies
/ Urban crime
/ Violent crimes
2006
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment
by
Ludwig, Jens
, Harcourt, Bernard E.
in
Affordable housing
/ Arrest rates
/ Arrests
/ Broken windows theory
/ Cities
/ Crime
/ Criminal arrests
/ Criminal statistics
/ Experiments
/ Hypotheses
/ Impact analysis
/ Law enforcement
/ Low income groups
/ Misdemeanor offenses
/ Neighborhoods
/ Police
/ Police services
/ Property crimes
/ Public housing
/ Social research
/ Studies
/ Urban crime
/ Violent crimes
2006
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment
Journal Article
Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment
2006
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In 1982, James Q. Wilson and George Kelling suggested in an influential article in the Atlantic Monthly that targeting minor disorder could help reduce more serious crime. More than twenty years later, the three most populous cities in the United States-New York, Chicago, and, most recently, Los Angeles-have all adopted at least some aspect of Wilson and Kelling's theory, primarily through more aggressive enforcement of minor misdemeanor laws. Remarkably little, though, is currently known about the effect of broken windows policing on crime. According to a recent National Research Council report, existing research does not provide strong support for the broken windows hypothesis-with the possible exception of a 2001 study of crime trends in New York City by George Kelling and William Sousa. In this Article, we reexamine the 2001 Kelling and Sousa study and independently analyze the crime data from New York City for the 1989-1998 period. In addition, we present results from an important social experiment known as Moving to Opportunity (MTO) underway in five cities, including New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, as well as Baltimore and Boston, that provides a unique opportunity to overcome some of the problems with previous empirical tests of the broken windows hypothesis. Under this program, approximately 4,600 low-income families living in high-crime public housing communities characterized by high rates of social disorder were randomly assigned housing vouchers to move to less disadvantaged and disorderly communities. Taken together, the evidence from New York City and from the five-city social experiment provides no support for a simple first-order disorder-crime relationship as hypothesized by Wilson and Kelling, nor for the proposition that broken windows policing is the optimal use of scarce law enforcement resources.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.