Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Racially Polarized Voting
by
Abrajano, Marisa A.
, Elmendorf, Christopher S.
, Quinn, Kevin M.
in
Bloc voting
/ Candidates
/ Constitutional law
/ Election laws
/ Elections
/ Generations
/ Minority voters
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Race discrimination
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting behavior
/ Voting precincts
/ Voting rights
/ Voting Rights Act
/ Voting Rights Act of 1965 (United States)
/ White people
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Racially Polarized Voting
by
Abrajano, Marisa A.
, Elmendorf, Christopher S.
, Quinn, Kevin M.
in
Bloc voting
/ Candidates
/ Constitutional law
/ Election laws
/ Elections
/ Generations
/ Minority voters
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Race discrimination
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting behavior
/ Voting precincts
/ Voting rights
/ Voting Rights Act
/ Voting Rights Act of 1965 (United States)
/ White people
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Racially Polarized Voting
by
Abrajano, Marisa A.
, Elmendorf, Christopher S.
, Quinn, Kevin M.
in
Bloc voting
/ Candidates
/ Constitutional law
/ Election laws
/ Elections
/ Generations
/ Minority voters
/ Political candidates
/ Political elections
/ Race discrimination
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting behavior
/ Voting precincts
/ Voting rights
/ Voting Rights Act
/ Voting Rights Act of 1965 (United States)
/ White people
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Racially Polarized Voting
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Whether voting is racially polarized has for the last generation been the linchpin question in vote dilution cases under the core, nationally applicable provision of the Voting Rights Act. The polarization test is supposed to be clear-cut (\"manageable\"), diagnostic of liability, and free of strong racial assumptions. Using evidence from a random sample of vote dilution cases, we argue that these objectives have not been realized in practice and, further, that they cannot be realized under current conditions. The roots of the problem are twofold: (1) the widely shared belief that polarization determinations should be grounded on votes cast in actual elections; and (2) normative disagreement, often covert, about the meaning of racial vote dilution. We argue that the principal normative theories of vote dilution have conflicting implications for the racial-polarization test. We also show that votes are related only contingently to the political preferences that the polarization inquiry is supposed to reveal and, further, that the estimation of candidates' vote shares by racial group from ballots cast in actual elections depends on racial-homogeneity assumptions similar to those that the Supreme Court has disavowed. Our analysis casts serious doubt on the notion—promoted in dicta by the Supreme Court and supported by prominent commentators—that courts sfwuld establish bright-line vote-share cutoffs for \"legally significant\" racial polarization. The courts would do better to screen vote dilution claims using either evidence of preference polarization derived from surveys or nonpreference evidence of minority political incorporation.
Publisher
The University of Chicago Law School,University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.