MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis
Journal Article

Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Trident and Conventional Cannula in Genicular RF Procedures Under Fluoroscopy for Gonarthrosis

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA), including conventional, cooled, and pulsed techniques, has been used in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to compare conventional and trident GNRFA application methods, to evaluate the characteristics of fluoroscopy use and to evaluate the differences in terms of x-ray exposure. Observational study and original research. This work was conducted at Adana City Hospital, Adana, Turkey. A 3-pronged radiofrequency ablation (RFA) cannula was pushed under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance to known sites of the superomedial genicular nerve, superolateral genicular nerve, inferomedial genicular nerve, nerve to vastus medialis, nerve to vastus lateralis and nerve to vastus intermedius shortly after suitable placement, sterile preparation, and subcutaneous anaesthesia. All patients were exposed to ablation at RF 90°C for 60 seconds. The study included 41 patients, 28 (68.3%) women and 13 (31.7%) men, with a mean age of 68.2 ± 7.0 years. Conventional and Trident™ GNRFA was performed in 22 and 19 patients, respectively. The median radioactivity exposure in the conventional GNRFA group was 0.14 (0.11/0.17) mGy, while the median radioactivity exposure in the Trident™ group was 0.11 (0.06/0.17) (P < 0.001). WOMAC scores between the baseline and first- and third-month post-treatment in the Trident™ group were significantly higher than in the conventional group (P = 0.018 and P = 0.006, respectively). In both treatment groups, the improvement in VAS and WOMAC scores was significant at one month and continued similarly at 3 months. The study's limitations include a small sample size and a lack of blinding due to the study design, which may have introduced bias. GNRFA using a lateral approach and a Trident™ cannula offers significant advantages, including better improvement in WOMAC scores, shorter procedure times, fewer fluoroscopy shots, and reduced radiation exposure.