Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Análisis y revisión del sarcasmo y la lítote: propuesta desde la Teoría de la Relevancia Analysis and review of the role of sarcasm and litote: A proposal from the perspective of the Theory of Relevance
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Análisis y revisión del sarcasmo y la lítote: propuesta desde la Teoría de la Relevancia Analysis and review of the role of sarcasm and litote: A proposal from the perspective of the Theory of Relevance
Do you wish to request the book?
Análisis y revisión del sarcasmo y la lítote: propuesta desde la Teoría de la Relevancia Analysis and review of the role of sarcasm and litote: A proposal from the perspective of the Theory of Relevance
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Análisis y revisión del sarcasmo y la lítote: propuesta desde la Teoría de la Relevancia Analysis and review of the role of sarcasm and litote: A proposal from the perspective of the Theory of Relevance
2009
Overview
En general, el sarcasmo y la lítote han sido consideradas tradicionalmente como figuras retóricas y, por tanto, como usos dislocados del lenguaje. Desde la tradición clásica, se ha aceptado que existen dos tipos de lenguaje: el literal y el figurado. En tal sentido, este artículo pretende hacer un repaso a algunas consideraciones realizadas desde la Teoría de la Relevancia y, por tanto, concluir que existe un único lenguaje que depende de la relevancia comunicativa perseguida.Overall, sarcasm and litote have been considered rhetorical figures and, therefore, dislocated uses of language. Classical studies accept the existence of two different languages: the literal one and the figurative one, whereas more recent theoretical frameworks, such as Relevance Theory, disagree with this standpoint. In that sense, this paper attempts to revisit some classical considerations from the perspective of Relevance Theory; one significant conclusion will be that there is only one language with different uses guided by communicative relevance.
