Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part 3
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part 3
Do you wish to request the book?
Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part 3
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Conference Proceeding
Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part 3
2017
Overview
This study continues the work by the authors to investigate the efficacy of homework in an engineering mechanics (Statics & Dynamics) course, starting with data from the fall semester of 2013. Throughout this study we have investigated: hand-written solutions, frequent quizzes based on homework problems, and the Pearson Mastering Engineering software. Thus far variations in homework systems have had only minimal impacts on the student’s overall performance in the class, as assessed by performance on exam scores. In this paper authors will present the impact of utilizing the “adaptive follow-up” modules in Pearson Mastering Engineering, as well as a reflection on the different methods used over the study period. As in previous years, assessment of the efficacy of homework assignments will be based on observation of students’ performance on exams, and a survey of students’ perceptions relative to historical norms. Institutional review of research protocol determined that full board review of the study and informed consent was not required.
Publisher
American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE
Subject
