MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now
Journal Article

Poltergeist/RSPK Quantitative and Qualitative Study From Antiquity Until Now

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction: Many studies/books have been published about Poltergeist presenting cases and their characteristics as (Flammarion, 1923), (Thurston, 1953), (Roll, 1972), (Gauld & Cornell 1979), (Huesmann & Schriver 1989), (Biondi & Garatelli 2011), (Healy & Cropper 2014) to name a few. Main quantitative studies have been done at a time where the computer was in infancy and so with only printed material. Today it seems that very few consolidated databases are available, and the new cases are not filed or filed in different databases and formats. However, the information available is huge and with enough aggregation, it could help to detect some trends over the different periods or by geographics and help to qualify the credibility/authenticity of the cases and their different characteristics. At the end, this could give some important insight on the anomalistic arena and the research on the nature of reality. Method: In order to conduct a quantitative and qualitative study on poltergeist a set of representative cases has to be found (a sample with enough cases and with a diversity on period and geographics). To characterize each case a set of parameters has to be defined (ex: presence of raps, objects movement, incendiary effects, poltergeist agent detected, materialization, apparition, etc.). The more advanced study on this is the one conducted in (Gauld & Cornell 1979), as it provides a study counting 500 cases with 63 parameters for each, from year 500 to 1975 and with an international view (46 countries, even if there is a tropism on English cases). Interestingly each case has attached a level of testimony and a level of detail. So, starting from this book a database has been built, completed with cross references of other books and articles. Using these data, a study of the evolution of the different characteristics of the Poltergeist/ RSPK cases through time and geographics has been made. We also did an estimated counting of the different cases documented through the different countries (Europe, USA and Australia mainly). Results: More than thousand cases have been referenced from which more than 700 seem to have serious documentation (reference to a paper, a book, some articles in newspaper/magazine with enough details). With the 500 Gauld & Cornell cases, the analysis per geographic/ period shows: · The homogeneity of the characteristics through period and geographics area, even if some differences appear (which could be explained by belief/cultural evolution on time, cultural difference between countries) · The strength of some \"strange characteristics\" if we compare them with the level of testimony (better is the level of testimony, more these characteristics are represented) · The evolution of the interpretation of the phenomenon per period The progression of the number of cases per year in this sample has been evaluated (ex: 2 per year on the 1940-1975 period). Then, deeper research has been conducted to analyze strange characteristics across different cases, using the detail description/story of the cases. Discussion: Moving from there, it would be interesting to complement this database with cases from 1975 until today. From our evaluation, 60 documented cases which represented 1,3 cases per year could be added on this period. It has also to be completed with more cases on Asia, Africa, South America to be more representative. One question today is how the collect of Poltergeist/RSPK cases in the different areas of the world could be improved (for example, in France and Italy an estimate let think that 2 documented cases per year could be identified in each country, number from which we are far today).Also it could be useful to define which information should be collected for each case (on both psychological and physical events information) and in which format it will be stored in order to be able to share it without privacy problem.