Paper

Host Galaxies for Four Nearby CHIME/FRB Sources and the Local Universe FRB Host Galaxy Population

Bhardwaj, Mohit, Fonseca, Emmanuel, Sand, Ketan R, Fengqiu Adam Dong, Chatterjee, Shami, Lanman, Adam E, Pearlman, Aaron B, Michilli, Daniele, Shin, Kaitlyn, Kaspi, Victoria M, Brar, Charanjot, Prochaska, J Xavier, Kaczmarek, J F, Masui, K W, Scholz, Paul, Pleunis, Ziggy, Cook, Amanda M, Leung, Calvin, Smith, Kendrick M, Andersen, Bridget C, Pandhi, Ayush, Aida Yu Kirichenko, Rafiei-Ravandi, Masoud, Gaensler, B M, Cassanelli, Tomas, Modilim, Obinna, Ibik, Adaeze L

2023

Overview

We present the host galaxies of four apparently non-repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs), FRBs 20181223C, 20190418A, 20191220A, and 20190425A, reported in the first Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME/FRB) catalog. Our selection of these FRBs is based on a planned hypothesis testing framework where we search all CHIME/FRB Catalog-1 events that have low extragalactic dispersion measure (< 100 pc cm\\(^{-3}\\)), with high Galactic latitude (|b| > 10\\(\\deg\\)) and saved baseband data. We associate the selected FRBs to galaxies with moderate to high star-formation rates located at redshifts between 0.027 and 0.071. We also search for possible multi-messenger counterparts, including persistent compact radio and gravitational wave (GW) sources, and find none. Utilizing the four FRB hosts from this study along with the hosts of 14 published local Universe FRBs (z < 0.1) with robust host association, we conduct an FRB host demographics analysis. We find all 18 local Universe FRB hosts in our sample to be spirals (or late-type galaxies), including the host of FRB 20220509G, which was previously reported to be elliptical. Using this observation, we scrutinize proposed FRB source formation channels and argue that core-collapse supernovae are likely the dominant channel to form FRB progenitors. Moreover, we infer no significant difference in the host properties of repeating and apparently non-repeating FRBs in our local Universe FRB host sample. Finally, we find the burst rates of these four apparently non-repeating FRBs to be consistent with those of the sample of localized repeating FRBs observed by CHIME/FRB. Therefore, we encourage further monitoring of these FRBs with more sensitive radio telescopes.

• Publisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
• Subject: Demographics / Galaxies / Gravitational waves / Hypothesis testing / Local group (astronomy) / Radio astronomy / Radio bursts / Radio sources (astronomy) / Radio telescopes / Star formation / Supernovae / Universe