Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science
by
Hiniker, Alexis
, Wolfe, Robert
, Howe, Bill
in
Bias
/ Embedding
/ Empirical analysis
/ Rendering
/ Taxonomy
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science
by
Hiniker, Alexis
, Wolfe, Robert
, Howe, Bill
in
Bias
/ Embedding
/ Empirical analysis
/ Rendering
/ Taxonomy
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science
Paper
ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This research introduces the Multilevel Embedding Association Test (ML-EAT), a method designed for interpretable and transparent measurement of intrinsic bias in language technologies. The ML-EAT addresses issues of ambiguity and difficulty in interpreting the traditional EAT measurement by quantifying bias at three levels of increasing granularity: the differential association between two target concepts with two attribute concepts; the individual effect size of each target concept with two attribute concepts; and the association between each individual target concept and each individual attribute concept. Using the ML-EAT, this research defines a taxonomy of EAT patterns describing the nine possible outcomes of an embedding association test, each of which is associated with a unique EAT-Map, a novel four-quadrant visualization for interpreting the ML-EAT. Empirical analysis of static and diachronic word embeddings, GPT-2 language models, and a CLIP language-and-image model shows that EAT patterns add otherwise unobservable information about the component biases that make up an EAT; reveal the effects of prompting in zero-shot models; and can also identify situations when cosine similarity is an ineffective metric, rendering an EAT unreliable. Our work contributes a method for rendering bias more observable and interpretable, improving the transparency of computational investigations into human minds and societies.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.