Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Explanation to Intellectual Action and Regress Argument 1
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Explanation to Intellectual Action and Regress Argument 1
Do you wish to request the book?
Explanation to Intellectual Action and Regress Argument 1
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Explanation to Intellectual Action and Regress Argument 1
2024
Overview
Šiame straipsnyje atkreipiame dėmesi i problemą, susijusią su J. Stanley'io ir T. Williamsono Ryleb regreso argumento rekonstrukcija, kad paneigtume ju kritiką Ryleb argumento atžvilgiu. Ryleb kritikos objektą nustatome analizuodami kai kuriuos intelektualizmus, kurie bando išspręsti regreso argumentą. Norėdami suderinti intelektualizmo ir antiintelektualizmo prieštarą, siūlome nuosaikią intelektualizmo versiją - intelektualinio paaiškinimo tezę, kuri nesukelia begalinio regreso ir išlaiko būtiną ryši tarp „žiniu kaip\" ir „žiniu ko\". Šia alternatyvia teze ivedamas kriterijus, pagal kuri galima spręsti, veiksmas yra intelektualus ar ne, todėl siūlomas naujas požiūris i sudėtingą intelektualinio veiksmo ir žiniu santyki.
Publisher
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
Subject
