Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Harvesting Layer-2 Yield: Suboptimality in Automated Market Makers
by
Gogol, Krzysztof
, Schneider, Manvir
, Livshits, Benjamin
in
Staking
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Harvesting Layer-2 Yield: Suboptimality in Automated Market Makers
by
Gogol, Krzysztof
, Schneider, Manvir
, Livshits, Benjamin
in
Staking
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Harvesting Layer-2 Yield: Suboptimality in Automated Market Makers
Paper
Harvesting Layer-2 Yield: Suboptimality in Automated Market Makers
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Layer-2 (L2) blockchains offer security guarantees for Ethereum while reducing transaction (gas) fees, and consequentially are gaining popularity among traders at Automated Market Makers (AMMs). However, Liquidity Providers (LPs) are lagging behind. Our empirical results show that AMM liquidity pools on Ethereum are oversubscribed compared to their counterparties on L2s and often deliver lower returns than staking ETH. LPs would receive higher rewards by reallocating part of the liquidity to AMMs on L2s, or staking. By employing Lagrangian optimization, we find the optimal liquidity allocation strategy that maximizes LPs rewards. Moreover, we show that the returns from liquidity provisions converge to the staking rate, and in a perfect equilibrium, liquidity provisions to any AMM should provide returns equal to staking rewards.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.