Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of deep learning and conventional methods for disease onset prediction
by
Rijnbeek, Peter R
, Chang, Junhyuk
, Reps, Jenna M
, John, Luis H
, Kim, Chungsoo
, Morgan-Cooper, Hannah
, Fridgeirsson, Egill A
, Kors, Jan A
, Desai, Priya
, Pang, Chao
in
Calibration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ Health care
/ Heterogeneity
/ Learning curves
/ Performance evaluation
/ Regression analysis
/ Sparsity
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of deep learning and conventional methods for disease onset prediction
by
Rijnbeek, Peter R
, Chang, Junhyuk
, Reps, Jenna M
, John, Luis H
, Kim, Chungsoo
, Morgan-Cooper, Hannah
, Fridgeirsson, Egill A
, Kors, Jan A
, Desai, Priya
, Pang, Chao
in
Calibration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ Health care
/ Heterogeneity
/ Learning curves
/ Performance evaluation
/ Regression analysis
/ Sparsity
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of deep learning and conventional methods for disease onset prediction
by
Rijnbeek, Peter R
, Chang, Junhyuk
, Reps, Jenna M
, John, Luis H
, Kim, Chungsoo
, Morgan-Cooper, Hannah
, Fridgeirsson, Egill A
, Kors, Jan A
, Desai, Priya
, Pang, Chao
in
Calibration
/ Datasets
/ Deep learning
/ Health care
/ Heterogeneity
/ Learning curves
/ Performance evaluation
/ Regression analysis
/ Sparsity
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of deep learning and conventional methods for disease onset prediction
Paper
Comparison of deep learning and conventional methods for disease onset prediction
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Conventional prediction methods such as logistic regression and gradient boosting have been widely utilized for disease onset prediction for their reliability and interpretability. Deep learning methods promise enhanced prediction performance by extracting complex patterns from clinical data, but face challenges like data sparsity and high dimensionality. Methods: This study compares conventional and deep learning approaches to predict lung cancer, dementia, and bipolar disorder using observational data from eleven databases from North America, Europe, and Asia. Models were developed using logistic regression, gradient boosting, ResNet, and Transformer, and validated both internally and externally across the data sources. Discrimination performance was assessed using AUROC, and calibration was evaluated using Eavg. Findings: Across 11 datasets, conventional methods generally outperformed deep learning methods in terms of discrimination performance, particularly during external validation, highlighting their better transportability. Learning curves suggest that deep learning models require substantially larger datasets to reach the same performance levels as conventional methods. Calibration performance was also better for conventional methods, with ResNet showing the poorest calibration. Interpretation: Despite the potential of deep learning models to capture complex patterns in structured observational healthcare data, conventional models remain highly competitive for disease onset prediction, especially in scenarios involving smaller datasets and if lengthy training times need to be avoided. The study underscores the need for future research focused on optimizing deep learning models to handle the sparsity, high dimensionality, and heterogeneity inherent in healthcare datasets, and find new strategies to exploit the full capabilities of deep learning methods.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.