MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms
Journal Article

O-064 Comparative analysis of endovascular treatment methods for anterior choroidal aneurysms single center study with 80 aneurysms

Z Oz,
2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundAnterior choroidal artery (AChoA) aneurysms are rare and pose a significant treatment challenge due to the artery’s small caliber and critical vascular territory. Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become a preferred approach, but optimal management strategies remain debated. This study compares the efficacy and safety of different EVT techniques, including primary coiling, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), and flow diversion (FD) in treating AChoA aneurysms.MethodsPatients were categorized by treatment modality, aneurysm morphology, and rupture status. Angiographic occlusion rates were assessed using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Scale (RROS), and clinical outcomes were measured via the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and follow-ups. Statistical analyses compared occlusion rates, procedural complications, and functional outcomes among treatment groups.Results60 patients with 80 aneurysms, 44 (55%) were dependent(choroidal branch arises from aneurysm dome or neck) and 36 (45%) were independent(aneurysm arises adjacent to the choroidal branch) AChoA aneurysms. Primary coiling was performed in 29 cases, SAC in 21, and FD (with or without adjunctive coiling) in 30. Complete occlusion rates were significantly higher with SAC (83.3%) and FD (76.1%) compared to primary coiling (51.7%) (p = 0.007). Flow diversion had a higher rate of technical complications (25%), while ischemic complications were more frequent in dependent aneurysms (p < 0.05). No cases of symptomatic AChoA occlusion were observed after FD treatment. The overall mortality rate was 5%, with all cases occurring in the primary coiling group.ConclusionEVT of AChoA aneurysms is effective, with SAC and FD demonstrating superior occlusion rates compared to primary coiling. FD carries a higher risk of technical complications but maintains AChoA patency. Treatment choice should be guided by aneurysm morphology and patient risk factors to optimize outcomes.Abstract O-064 Figure 1DisclosuresY. Senol: None. H. Ciftci: None. Z. Oz: None. D. Duman: None. B. Sayin: None. M. Ozbakir: None. I. Akmangit: None. A. Belen: None. E. Daglioglu: None.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subject