Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
VIEWS OF IMAMIYYAH SCHOLARS ON STATE OWNERSHIP
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
VIEWS OF IMAMIYYAH SCHOLARS ON STATE OWNERSHIP
Do you wish to request the book?
VIEWS OF IMAMIYYAH SCHOLARS ON STATE OWNERSHIP
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
VIEWS OF IMAMIYYAH SCHOLARS ON STATE OWNERSHIP
2025
Overview
In this study, the researcher deals with (the views of Imamiyya scholars in the ownership of the state), which aims first: to indicate the evidence of those who said from Imamiyya scholars that the state does not own the funds it possesses, and that they are what is called (the unknown owner), according to the denial of the human personality of the state, and this saying is famous among jurists, and they also said that these funds are disposed of according to the provisions of the unknown owner prescribed in the books of jurisprudence, that they must be charity, or taken as a gift by the legitimate ruler, and the like provisions. On the other hand, we find that there are those who said the ownership of the state and proved the human personality of the state, and therefore that the funds in the possession of the state are not from the unknown owner, but are funds whose owner cannot be accessed for several reasons, so the state is one of the custodians of these funds, whether this state is legitimate or illegitimate, and it is the most common in Islamic countries, as well as non-Islamic, and each of the disputing parties has relied on several evidence that the researcher tries to review and discusses and any evidence accepted, and any other evidence to reach the desired result of the study.
